Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove Demo Classes, add No-Op Step #129

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 31, 2023
Merged

Remove Demo Classes, add No-Op Step #129

merged 4 commits into from
Oct 31, 2023

Conversation

dbwiddis
Copy link
Member

@dbwiddis dbwiddis commented Oct 31, 2023

Description

Removes demo package, since it no longer works and future development has made it obsolete.

Adds a new NoOpStep workflow step that does nothing, useful for the case of a synchronizing node as well as testing

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 31, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #129 (b533525) into main (8e85f98) will increase coverage by 0.37%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main     #129      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     66.71%   67.09%   +0.37%     
- Complexity      272      276       +4     
============================================
  Files            34       35       +1     
  Lines          1322     1319       -3     
  Branches        125      125              
============================================
+ Hits            882      885       +3     
+ Misses          395      390       -5     
+ Partials         45       44       -1     
Files Coverage Δ
...rg/opensearch/flowframework/workflow/NoOpStep.java 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...ch/flowframework/workflow/WorkflowStepFactory.java 100.00% <100.00%> (+28.57%) ⬆️

Signed-off-by: Daniel Widdis <[email protected]>
Copy link
Member

@owaiskazi19 owaiskazi19 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We are out of demo phase!

Copy link
Member

@joshpalis joshpalis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks Dan, I'll merge this in first and rebase #119

@joshpalis joshpalis merged commit 9dffc0a into opensearch-project:main Oct 31, 2023
21 checks passed
opensearch-trigger-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 31, 2023
* Remove Demo Classes, add No-Op Step

Signed-off-by: Daniel Widdis <[email protected]>

* Add test coverage

Signed-off-by: Daniel Widdis <[email protected]>

* Revert enum javadocs as they are handled by #119

Signed-off-by: Daniel Widdis <[email protected]>

---------

Signed-off-by: Daniel Widdis <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Owais Kazi <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Owais Kazi <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 9dffc0a)
Signed-off-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
joshpalis pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 31, 2023
Remove Demo Classes, add No-Op Step (#129)

* Remove Demo Classes, add No-Op Step



* Add test coverage



* Revert enum javadocs as they are handled by #119



---------




(cherry picked from commit 9dffc0a)

Signed-off-by: Daniel Widdis <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Owais Kazi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Owais Kazi <[email protected]>
@dbwiddis dbwiddis deleted the no-demo branch October 31, 2023 19:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport 2.x backport PRs to 2.x branch
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants