-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Feature Request] Support for Experimental Codecs #13723
Comments
@sarthakaggarwal97 Could the custom-codecs plugin itself create an register a static setting like |
@andrross Do you mean a static cluster setting? It would be like a feature flag right. Please correct me if I am wrong. We might have to utilize this interface so that we can mark codecs as experimental. Another benefit of an interface change is that it gives a way for other plugins as well to use it. We have plugins like Security Analytics, K-nn who also currently maintain their own codecs, and might have similar use cases in the future. I feel it will be a combination of both the setting and a clean way to mark the new codecs as experimental. We can then have assertions in place to block the create index call. |
@sarthakaggarwal97 Yeah it would functionally work the same way as a feature flag, but just be scoped to the custom-codecs plugin in this case. I think in order to determine exactly how we implement this feature we'll want to clearly define the user experience. If we extend the CodecSettings interface, how do we implement the behavior? What's a system admin's experience for enabling and disabling experimental codecs? |
@andrross since the validation to select the codec happens in EngineConfig, we might need to implement the feature flag within OpenSearch itself. CodecSettings interface would help us know whether the particular codec is experimental or not, while the feature flag would make experimental codecs available via CodecService. Tagging @reta @mgodwan @backslasht for inputs. |
I would 💯 agree with @andrross that experimental codecs should be contained in |
I guess we should be able to have the setting in custom-codecs. We might have to still expose the Apologies if I am missing something here, please correct me if I am wrong. |
I would encourage to not rely on CodecSettings anyhow (for this specific feature) |
@sarthakaggarwal97 Can you elaborate a bit on what you mean here? I get that there are sharp edges on the user experience (i.e. if you disable an experimental codec then any existing indexes using that codec will fail), but that is sort of expected for these opt-in experimental features until they are stabilized and fully supported. To me, the simplest option here is to just let custom-codecs choose whether to register experimental codecs at startup based on the existence of a static setting. What about that implementation doesn't work with the experience you have in mind? |
It is not possible, the service loader mechanism does not support that (afaik) |
To me, the most logical way to move forward is to contain the change in |
The challenge would be make the experimental codecs not available in the index.codec settings validations. |
Not sure I get it: If experimental codec is not enabled (in |
If the codecs are registered by NamedSPI, they would be available over here |
Same answer as for |
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe
With the introduction of new custom codecs, it gets essential to bake the new codecs before marking them ready for production. This helps us to avoid potential index corruption risks, and allows for the community feedback to flow in before we make the codecs as generally available.
Earlier, we used to have sandbox for codecs OpenSearch, with the introduction of the separate repository for custom codecs, it gets important to have a similar functionality available in the codecs plugin as well.
Describe the solution you'd like
We can extend the existing CodecSettings interface to know whether the codec is experimental upon index creation.
Related component
Indexing
Describe alternatives you've considered
No response
Additional context
Coming from opensearch-project/custom-codecs#148
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: