Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Practice Page: Explore the library #23

Open
shaheinm opened this issue May 14, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

Practice Page: Explore the library #23

shaheinm opened this issue May 14, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@shaheinm
Copy link
Collaborator

shaheinm commented May 14, 2020

As Nova, I need to see internal OPL links in an organized fashion, so that I can further my understanding of how the practices may work together.

ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA

Given I am on a Practice page
When I complete my reading of a single practice
Then I should see categorized links to other practices at the bottom of the page

NOTES

BLOCKERS

@shaheinm shaheinm added this to the Practice Page Template milestone May 14, 2020
@omcneil omcneil added V1 and removed Delivery labels Jun 4, 2020
@shaheinm
Copy link
Collaborator Author

shaheinm commented Jun 4, 2020

@heyjerrybecker @DarcieF More information is needed to groom this ticket appropriately. Namely:

  • For v1, is it acceptable for the internal links displayed here to be provided by content creators?

  • If so, do we want to separate the content per the designs and require internal links from content creators?

  • If not, how do we want to determine related content? We assume tags, but there are many ways to create an algorithm to create related links.

@shaheinm shaheinm changed the title Explore the library Practice Page: Explore the library Jun 17, 2020
@omcneil omcneil removed this from the Practice Page Template milestone Jun 18, 2020
@DarcieF DarcieF added Needs Design and removed V1 labels Jun 18, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants