Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[PRE REVIEW]: EcoLogits: Evaluate the Environmental Impacts of Generative AI #7284

Open
editorialbot opened this issue Sep 25, 2024 · 10 comments

Comments

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Submitting author: @adrienbanse (Adrien Banse)
Repository: https://github.com/genai-impact/ecologits
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss
Version: v0.5.0
Editor: Pending
Reviewers: Pending
Managing EiC: Kristen Thyng

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/30061de5abeaf322be9beaec80f6242d"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/30061de5abeaf322be9beaec80f6242d/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/30061de5abeaf322be9beaec80f6242d/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/30061de5abeaf322be9beaec80f6242d)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @adrienbanse. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@adrienbanse if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
@editorialbot editorialbot added pre-review Track: 6 (ESE) Earth Sciences and Ecology labels Sep 25, 2024
@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.06 s (1940.0 files/s, 200939.9 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAML                            43            837             40           3686
Python                          34            593            327           2705
Markdown                        18            697              0           1357
TeX                              1             28              0            359
CSV                              2              0              0            267
TOML                             1             21              1            183
CSS                              1             16             12             67
JavaScript                       2              4              1             29
JSON                             3              0              0             24
make                             1              6              0             22
HTML                             2              0              2              5
SVG                              1              0              0              1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                           109           2202            383           8705
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

   263	Samuel Rince
   113	Adrien Banse
    30	luc
    10	Samuel Rincé
     5	vinh
     4	Luc BERTON
     2	Clovis Varangot-Reille
     2	Luc
     1	DataForGood (Tech)
     1	Nina P.
     1	Yoann Couble
     1	yco

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 1955

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

License info:

✅ License found: Mozilla Public License 2.0 (Valid open source OSI approved license)

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

✅ OK DOIs

- 10.48550/arXiv.2211.02001 is OK
- 10.1016/j.joule.2023.09.004 is OK
- 10.1145/3630106.3658542 is OK
- 10.1016/j.suscom.2023.100857 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.2104.10350 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.1910.09700 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.2302.13971 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.2307.09288 is OK
- 10.1145/3630106.3658542 is OK
- 10.3390/su14095172 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.11171501 is OK
- 10.1007/BF02986351 is OK
- 10.1007/s11367-019-01683-x is OK
- 10.1007/s11367-015-0897-4 is OK
- 10.1007/BF02978943 is OK
- 10.1007/BF02978624 is OK

🟡 SKIP DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: Llama 3 Model Card
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Zeus: Understanding and Optimizing GPU Energy Cons...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: LLM-Perf Leaderboard
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Optimum-Benchmark: A framework for benchmarking th...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: BoaviztAPI: a bottom-up model to assess the enviro...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Digital technologies in Europe: an environmental l...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: The Global E-waste Monitor 2020. Quantities, flows...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Base Empreinte®
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Large data centers are mostly more efficient, anal...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Uptime Institute Global Data Center Survey Results...

❌ MISSING DOIs

- None

❌ INVALID DOIs

- None

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

bonsai_ipcc - a Python package for the calculation of national greenhouse gas inventories
Submitting author: @mabudz
Handling editor: @pdebuyl (Active)
Reviewers: @GISWLH, @PennyHow
Similarity score: 0.6325

PEFAP : Estimating the environmental footprint of food products from packaging data
Submitting author: @GustaveCoste
Handling editor: @vissarion (Active)
Reviewers: @marvinjonathcn, @simonom
Similarity score: 0.6303

LCIA Formatter
Submitting author: @WesIngwersen
Handling editor: @csoneson (Active)
Reviewers: @tngTUDOR, @mfastudillo
Similarity score: 0.6270

GeoClimate: a Geospatial processing toolbox for environmental and climate studies
Submitting author: @ebocher
Handling editor: @elbeejay (Active)
Reviewers: @abhishekvp, @omshinde, @arbennett
Similarity score: 0.6247

seesus: a social, environmental, and economic sustainability classifier for Python
Submitting author: @caimeng2
Handling editor: @oliviaguest (Active)
Reviewers: @varsha2509, @luyuhao0326
Similarity score: 0.6130

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

@kthyng
Copy link

kthyng commented Sep 25, 2024

Hi @adrienbanse and thanks for your submission! I am looking for some specific items to make sure your submission fits our requirements at a high level (not at the more detailed review level) before moving on to finding an editor or putting this on our waitlist if no relevant editors are available. I'll comment over time as I have a chance to go through them:

In the meantime, please take a look at the comments above ⬆️ from the editorialbot to address any DOI, license, or paper issues if you're able (there may not be any), or suggest reviewers. For reviewers, please suggest 5 reviewers from the database listed above or your own (non-conflicted) extended network. Their github handles are most useful to receive but please don't use "@" to reference them since it will prematurely ping them.

@adrienbanse
Copy link

Hey @kthyng, thanks a lot!

We suggest the following five reviewers from our own extended network:

  • shaoleiren
  • mjay42
  • vict0rsch
  • jaywonchung
  • annlor

cc @samuelrince

@kthyng
Copy link

kthyng commented Sep 27, 2024

@adrienbanse

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants