Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Naming convention for reserve capacity in electricity generation #39

Open
danielhuppmann opened this issue May 29, 2020 · 3 comments
Open
Labels
definitions Additions to (or suggestions for) the codelists

Comments

@danielhuppmann
Copy link
Member

#35 introduced a number of variables related to reserve capacity in electricity generation, namely "Automatic Frequency Restoration" and "Frequency Containment". I recall other terms used here, like primary and secondary reserve.

What is the latest consensus for naming conventions of the different types of reserve capacity? I suggest that we use this issue to agree on a common definition (references/links welcome), then include it in the variable/technology/README.md, and then start adding variables.

@danielhuppmann danielhuppmann added the definitions Additions to (or suggestions for) the codelists label May 29, 2020
@danielhuppmann
Copy link
Member Author

@sandrinecharousset
Copy link
Collaborator

The standard terms used by ENTSO-e are:
-Frequency Containment Reserve,

  • Frequency Restoration Reserve, (note, this is manual contrary to the following)
  • automatic Frequency Restoration Reserve,
  • Replacement Reserve
    In our models we sometimes use primary, secondary, tertiary or other terms, which cover some (potentially different among countries) national definitions of reserves. They usually can be computed from the entso-e's (eg in france primary=FCR, secondary=aFRR, more complex to find a correspondence with tertiary, ....).

@sandrinecharousset
Copy link
Collaborator

@danielhuppmann I think this issue can be closed as we have defined reserves by using the entso-e reference words

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
definitions Additions to (or suggestions for) the codelists
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants