Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SDK 2.0 OTLP exporters #4128

Open
dyladan opened this issue Sep 6, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

SDK 2.0 OTLP exporters #4128

dyladan opened this issue Sep 6, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@dyladan
Copy link
Member

dyladan commented Sep 6, 2023

The 2.x line will require an exporter for each signal for testing during development. We will select 1 OTLP exporter per stable signal and copy them into the 2.x line. The exporters will continue to target the same SDK version as the other experimental packages. If the OTLP exporters are stabilized during the 2.x development, they will be released as 1.x and moved into the 2.x line at that time.

@dyladan dyladan added this to the OpenTelemetry SDK 2.0 milestone Sep 6, 2023
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 6, 2023

This issue is stale because it has been open 60 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 14 days.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Nov 6, 2023
@dyladan dyladan added never-stale and removed stale labels Nov 8, 2023
@MSNev
Copy link
Contributor

MSNev commented Dec 20, 2023

As part of the Event WG there is a side discussion occurring around potentially creating 1 or more different supported export formats. open-telemetry/semantic-conventions#505 (comment)

As part of any optimization (changing the internal representation to closer/exactly match the serialized out) then any refactoring around defining the internal representation should consider that the internal representation (may) need to be different to support any configured exporter.

eg.

  • If a ProtoBuf exporter is used then we have the protobuf internal representation
  • If a web optimized (JSON) exporter is used then we have a different internal representation

Potentially, using a combination of Proxy, get/set to hide differences, with the usage of the internal types all defined and using interfaces and the user can configure the concrete types (somehow).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants