Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add stdout memory mode #6774

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

zeitlinger
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@zeitlinger zeitlinger requested a review from a team as a code owner October 10, 2024 11:33
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 10, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 94.30380% with 9 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 90.61%. Comparing base (b927d9d) to head (cfabe23).
Report is 8 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...tlp/internal/logs/OtlpStdoutLogRecordExporter.java 86.66% 1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
...tlp/internal/metrics/OtlpStdoutMetricExporter.java 89.47% 1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
...g/otlp/internal/traces/OtlpStdoutSpanExporter.java 86.66% 1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
...r/internal/otlp/logs/LogReusableDataMarshaler.java 95.00% 0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
...rnal/otlp/metrics/MetricReusableDataMarshaler.java 95.00% 0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
...nternal/otlp/traces/SpanReusableDataMarshaler.java 95.00% 0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main    #6774      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     90.10%   90.61%   +0.51%     
- Complexity     6541     6585      +44     
============================================
  Files           728      731       +3     
  Lines         19695    19722      +27     
  Branches       1935     1926       -9     
============================================
+ Hits          17746    17871     +125     
+ Misses         1349     1254      -95     
+ Partials        600      597       -3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@zeitlinger zeitlinger mentioned this pull request Oct 10, 2024
@zeitlinger zeitlinger self-assigned this Oct 10, 2024
@zeitlinger
Copy link
Member Author

@jack-berg this is the final PR for stdout - adding the memory mode feature


import io.opentelemetry.sdk.common.export.MemoryMode;

public class OtlpStdoutExporterBuilderUtil {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Missing internal boilerplate javadoc.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why did the build not fail?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There's not a build check for it right now. Do you know if opentelemetry-java-instrumentation managed to add this automation yet?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Opened new issue here: #6798

public CompletableResultCode doExport(Marshaler exportRequest, int numItems) {
return jsonWriter.write(exportRequest);
}
}.export(logs);
} else {
for (ResourceLogsMarshaler resourceLogs : ResourceLogsMarshaler.create(logs)) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It doesn't seem to be the case that if wrapperJsonObject = false, we can't take advantage of reuseable memory mode. Can we include wrapperJsonObject as an argument to LogReuseableDataMarshaler and adjust the logic accordingly?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

that's not so easy, because

takes a list and I didn't follow what has to be modified in there

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok let's punt on it for now

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants