Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ConcurrentModificationException in ConfigUtil #6732

Open
neugartf opened this issue Sep 19, 2024 · 7 comments
Open

ConcurrentModificationException in ConfigUtil #6732

neugartf opened this issue Sep 19, 2024 · 7 comments
Labels
Bug Something isn't working

Comments

@neugartf
Copy link

neugartf commented Sep 19, 2024

Describe the bug
There is a ConcurrentModificationException thrown while calling build() on LongGaugeBuilder.

Steps to reproduce
not yet

What did you expect to see?
No exception thrown

What did you see instead?
ConcurrentModificationException

What version and what artifacts are you using?
Artifacts: see *.gradle.kts excerpt below
Version: 1.42.1
How did you reference these artifacts?

implementation(platform("io.opentelemetry:opentelemetry-bom:1.42.1"))
implementation("io.opentelemetry:opentelemetry-context")
implementation("io.opentelemetry:opentelemetry-api")
implementation("io.opentelemetry:opentelemetry-exporter-common")
implementation("io.opentelemetry:opentelemetry-exporter-otlp")
implementation("io.opentelemetry:opentelemetry-exporter-logging")
implementation("io.opentelemetry:opentelemetry-extension-kotlin")
implementation("io.opentelemetry:opentelemetry-api-incubator")
implementation("io.opentelemetry:opentelemetry-extension-kotlin")
implementation("io.opentelemetry:opentelemetry-sdk")

Environment
Compiler: JDK 17 - Temurin
OS: Ubuntu (unknown version)
Runtime (if different from JDK above): Android runtime (ART)
OS (if different from OS compiled on): Android

Additional context

  Caused by java.util.ConcurrentModificationException:
at java.util.Hashtable$Enumerator.next(Hashtable.java:1397)
at java.util.Spliterators$IteratorSpliterator.tryAdvance(Spliterators.java:1812)
at java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline.forEachWithCancel(ReferencePipeline.java:133)
at java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.copyIntoWithCancel(AbstractPipeline.java:502)
at java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.copyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:489)
at java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.wrapAndCopyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:475)
at java.util.stream.FindOps$FindOp.evaluateSequential(FindOps.java:152)
at java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.evaluate(AbstractPipeline.java:236)
at java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline.findFirst(ReferencePipeline.java:482)
at io.opentelemetry.api.internal.ConfigUtil.getString(ConfigUtil.java:40)
at io.opentelemetry.sdk.metrics.internal.debug.DebugConfig.<clinit>(DebugConfig.java:25)
at io.opentelemetry.sdk.metrics.internal.debug.SourceInfo.fromCurrentStack(SourceInfo.java:45)
at io.opentelemetry.sdk.metrics.internal.descriptor.InstrumentDescriptor.<init>(InstrumentDescriptor.java:25)
at io.opentelemetry.sdk.metrics.internal.descriptor.AutoValue_InstrumentDescriptor.<init>(AutoValue_InstrumentDescriptor.java:28)
at io.opentelemetry.sdk.metrics.internal.descriptor.InstrumentDescriptor.create(InstrumentDescriptor.java:35)
at io.opentelemetry.sdk.metrics.InstrumentBuilder.newDescriptor(InstrumentBuilder.java:111)
at io.opentelemetry.sdk.metrics.InstrumentBuilder.buildSynchronousInstrument(InstrumentBuilder.java:78)
at io.opentelemetry.sdk.metrics.SdkLongGauge$SdkLongGaugeBuilder.build(SdkLongGauge.java:96)
at io.opentelemetry.sdk.metrics.SdkLongGauge$SdkLongGaugeBuilder.build(SdkLongGauge.java:58) 
@neugartf neugartf added the Bug Something isn't working label Sep 19, 2024
@harshitrjpt
Copy link

ConfigUtil.getString() uses System.getProperties() and Properties is not thread safe. Is it possible that your application in some other thread at the same time may be changing System.Properties in any way ?

I may be wrong, but to me it seems that making java.util.Properties thread safe is the only way.

@jack-berg
Copy link
Member

at io.opentelemetry.sdk.metrics.internal.debug.DebugConfig.(DebugConfig.java:25)

This is unusual because its in the static initialization block of DebugConfig, which is only called once at startup.

We could do something like new HashMap<>(System.getProperties()) to make a copy of the system properties, but even that iterates over the the entries of the properties and may be susceptible (somebody fact check me on this) to concurrent modification exceptions.

We could also wrap the iteration with in a try / catch.

We could also find a way to iterate over the keys in a way that avoid concurrent modification exceptions. According to the HashTable javadoc:

The Enumerations returned by Hashtable's keys and elements methods are not fail-fast.

This suggests that something like System.getProperties().keys() could be used in iteration in the ConfigUtil#getString method. Would want to study / test more to be sure.

@harshitrjpt
Copy link

harshitrjpt commented Sep 20, 2024

@jack-berg how about using ConcurrentHashMap to store a copy of the properties for iteration?

also AFAIK static block runs once when the class is loaded. I suppose DebugConfig.isMetricsDebugEnabled() in SourceInfo.fromCurrentStack() is the first time DebugConfig is referenced and hence loaded at that time. Maybe if we reference it earlier, but i don't think that would solve the issue.

@neugartf
Copy link
Author

neugartf commented Sep 23, 2024

Is it possible that your application in some other thread at the same time may be changing System.Properties in any way ?

@harshitrjpt : Theoretically no, but honestly Android might be doing some things here we don't have really insight about.

@neugartf
Copy link
Author

neugartf commented Sep 23, 2024

Would also vouch for a copy

System.getProperties().entrySet().stream().toArray()...
// or
Set.copyOf(properties.entrySet())

That should make iterating safe but ofc we wouldn't know about any changes to the list. Don't know if we necessarily need to.

@jack-berg
Copy link
Member

That should make iterating safe but ofc we wouldn't know about any changes to the list. Don't know if we necessarily need to.

It seems like we have no choice but to accept the possibility of changes between when we read the keyset and read the values.

neugartf added a commit to neugartf/opentelemetry-java that referenced this issue Sep 25, 2024
neugartf added a commit to neugartf/opentelemetry-java that referenced this issue Sep 25, 2024
@shalk
Copy link
Contributor

shalk commented Sep 30, 2024

ref: https://stackoverflow.com/a/52447030/4910370

I think copy the key set is a good idea.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants