-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 61
Jarbas and machine learning results #52
Comments
This just started at |
I just reslized the TODO list from the previous post changed considerably, so I'm gonna edit the post, remove the previous TODO list and use this one ro keep track of the progress:
|
Hi @daneoshiga: The changes described in that Issue will break compatibility with tapioca-jarbas (check the |
Thanks for the heads up, I'll keep keep an eye in the evolution of it and update tapioca-jarbas accordingly, thanks :) |
@daneoshiga soon I'm merging |
Closed by #64 |
@cuducos sorry for taking too long to reply. |
I'm documenting here the next steps of Jarbas in terms of development, i.e. it's a big issue, not a tiny and specific one.
We have a new player in Serenata de Amor operation that is Rosie. She's our robot, she'll tell us what she thinks of each reimbursement. Basically for each hypothesis of our roadmap Rosie will:
year
,applicant_id
anddocument_id
there is the aprobability
of irregularity/immorality/illegality (i.e.0 < probability < 1
) .POST
request to Jarbas with thisprobability
and an some meta information of the hypothesis this probability refers to.Thus Jarbas should be able to: (removed in favor of this list)
Conceptually this means that Jarbas is moving from an internal tool to help people engaged in Serenata de Amor to a public data visualization platform to a share our artificial intelligence machine learning results with the world. A lot of changes (refactor, renaming, endpoints etc.) are expected 🎉
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: