Replies: 1 comment
-
same as with absorbing all of the evaluations before the evaluation proof (cf #211 #221) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
@mrmr1993 keeps finding missing evaluation proofs in PRs that add evaluations to the proof. It is not easy to change the protocol safely, and there are some obvious places that should always be checked. The question is, how can we modify the implementation and, perhaps leverage the type system, to ensure that no evaluations will ever be missed?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions