You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We need to gather detailed information about our proof selection algorithm to guide Lambda in their implementation for the AlignedLayer proving in the Mina-EVM bridge project.
Objective:
Provide Lambda with a clear understanding of how our proof selection algorithm works, particularly in the context of verifying the "best block" when checking N blocks (where N < k, the protocol constant).
Key Questions to Address:
How does our current proof selection algorithm verify the "best block" when checking N blocks?
Can the short fork rules be applied directly, or is a more nuanced approach required?
What are the implications and considerations of N being smaller than the protocol constant k?
Are there any specific edge cases or scenarios that Lambda should be aware of?
How does this algorithm interact with or impact the overall consensus mechanism in the bridge context?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
MartinMinkov
changed the title
Title: Clarify Proof Selection Algorithm for Lambda's AlignedLayer Implementation
Clarify Proof Selection Algorithm for Lambda's AlignedLayer Implementation
Jul 16, 2024
We need to gather detailed information about our proof selection algorithm to guide Lambda in their implementation for the AlignedLayer proving in the Mina-EVM bridge project.
Objective:
Provide Lambda with a clear understanding of how our proof selection algorithm works, particularly in the context of verifying the "best block" when checking N blocks (where N < k, the protocol constant).
Key Questions to Address:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: