Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

drudg: staggered start is defeated by EARLY start #59

Open
wehimwich opened this issue Jul 8, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

drudg: staggered start is defeated by EARLY start #59

wehimwich opened this issue Jul 8, 2020 · 0 comments
Labels
drudg drudg specific wontfix This will not be worked on

Comments

@wehimwich
Copy link
Member

For staggered start scans when EARLY is specified, drudg starts recording EARLY relative to the nominal start time instead of the "data valid" time, thus defeating staggered start. It is unlikely that there is a need for this to be fixed. It can be worked around by setting EARLY 0 and extending the scan lengths by the desired EARLY amount. Staggered start is not a valid sked mode so it only has ersatz support anyway.
@wehimwich wehimwich added the wontfix This will not be worked on label Jul 8, 2020
@wehimwich wehimwich added the drudg drudg specific label Dec 4, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
drudg drudg specific wontfix This will not be worked on
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@wehimwich