Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Honour multi keypress timeout for NVDA key #17219

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 1, 2024

Conversation

CyrilleB79
Copy link
Collaborator

@CyrilleB79 CyrilleB79 commented Sep 25, 2024

Link to issue number:

Fix-up of #12049.

Summary of the issue:

When implementing multi keypress timeout in #12049, the timeout for double press of NVDA key (to execute native function) was not honoured.

Description of user facing changes

Multiple key press timeout will now be honoured also for double press of NVDA key.

Description of development approach

Replace the hard-coded value 0.5 with the config value.

Testing strategy:

Manual tests:
Increased the delay to 3000 ms and:

  • checked that double NVDA press on insert or capslock honour the native key function is executed
  • checked that 2 presses with more than 3000 ms between the presses do not execute the native key's function

Known issues with pull request:

Opened against beta since the PR being fixed up is part of this release cycle. But it may be too late to have a test period...

If you do not wish to introduce change at this stage, #12049 can remain in the release though, and I'll rebase on master.

Code Review Checklist:

  • Documentation:
    • Change log entry
    • User Documentation
    • Developer / Technical Documentation
    • Context sensitive help for GUI changes
  • Testing:
    • Unit tests
    • System (end to end) tests
    • Manual testing
  • UX of all users considered:
    • Speech
    • Braille
    • Low Vision
    • Different web browsers
    • Localization in other languages / culture than English
  • API is compatible with existing add-ons.
  • Security precautions taken.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced flexibility in keyboard input handling by allowing configurable timeout for modifier key presses.
  • Chores

    • Updated copyright notice to reflect the year 2024.

@CyrilleB79 CyrilleB79 changed the title Honour multi keypress delay for NVDA key Honour multi keypress timeout for NVDA key Sep 26, 2024
@CyrilleB79 CyrilleB79 marked this pull request as ready for review September 26, 2024 06:20
@CyrilleB79 CyrilleB79 requested a review from a team as a code owner September 26, 2024 06:20
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 26, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the copyright notice in the source/keyboardHandler.py file to the year 2024 and modifies the internal_keyDownEvent function. The timing logic for detecting the release of a modifier key is changed from a fixed timeout to a configurable value sourced from config.conf["keyboard"]["multiPressTimeout"], allowing for more adaptable key press event handling.

Changes

Files Change Summary
source/keyboardHandler.py Updated copyright year to 2024; modified internal_keyDownEvent to use a configurable timeout from config.conf.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

merge-early

Suggested reviewers

  • seanbudd

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@CyrilleB79
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@seanbudd FYI, PR opened against beta. Let me know if it's too late though.

@seanbudd seanbudd added the conceptApproved Similar 'triaged' for issues, PR accepted in theory, implementation needs review. label Oct 1, 2024
@SaschaCowley SaschaCowley merged commit 8259ce2 into nvaccess:beta Oct 1, 2024
4 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the 2025.1 milestone Oct 1, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
conceptApproved Similar 'triaged' for issues, PR accepted in theory, implementation needs review.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants