You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We currently have the "RFC021" e2e-test that provides the most coverage, but still not enough. At the same time, it was never intended as the "one test that tests databases".
Should we create a new e2e-test that tests:
all steps (including now missing revocation) for a particular application flow/use case
on all supported databases
Then we can simplify RFC021 test to cover only RFC021 (and not discovery and statuslist functionality, like it currently does).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
reinkrul
changed the title
Refactor e2e tests for better test coverage with storage variants
Refactor e2e tests for better test coverage
Oct 8, 2024
We currently have the "RFC021" e2e-test that provides the most coverage, but still not enough. At the same time, it was never intended as the "one test that tests databases".
Should we create a new e2e-test that tests:
Then we can simplify RFC021 test to cover only RFC021 (and not discovery and statuslist functionality, like it currently does).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: