This page documents how to develop ParaView through Git. See the README for more information.
Git is an extremely powerful version control tool that supports many different "workflows" for individual development and collaboration. Here we document procedures used by the ParaView development community. In the interest of simplicity and brevity we do not provide an explanation of why we use this approach.
Before you begin, perform initial setup:
-
Register GitLab Access to create an account and select a user name.
-
Fork ParaView into your user's namespace on GitLab.
-
Follow the download instructions to create a local clone of the main ParaView repository. Optionally configure Git to use SSH instead of HTTPS. Then clone:
$ git clone --recursive https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview.git ParaView $ cd ParaView
The main repository will be configured as your
origin
remote. -
Run the developer setup script to prepare your ParaView work tree and create Git command aliases used below:
$ ./Utilities/SetupForDevelopment.sh
This will prompt for your GitLab user name and configure a remote called
gitlab
to refer to it. -
(Optional but highly recommended.) Register with the ParaView project on Kitware's CDash instance to better know how your code performs in regression tests. After registering and signing in, click on "All Dashboards" link in the upper left corner, scroll down and click "Subscribe to this project" on the right of ParaView.
ParaView development uses a branchy workflow based on topic branches. Our collaboration workflow consists of three main steps:
-
Local Development:
-
Code Review (requires GitLab Access):
-
Integrate Changes:
- Merge a Topic (requires permission in GitLab)
- Delete a Topic
-
Update your local
master
branch:$ git checkout master $ git pullall
-
Optionally push
master
to your fork in GitLab:$ git push gitlab master
to keep it in sync. The
git gitlab-push
script used to Share a Topic below will also do this.
All new work must be committed on topic branches. Name topics like you might name functions: concise but precise. A reader should have a general idea of the feature or fix to be developed given just the branch name. Additionally, it is preferred to have an issue associated with every topic. The issue can document the bug or feature to be developed. In such cases, being your topic name with the issue number.
-
To start a new topic branch:
$ git fetch origin
If there is an issue associated with the topic, assign the issue to yourself using the "Assignee" field, and add the
workflow:active-development
label to it. -
For new development, start the topic from
origin/master
:$ git checkout -b my-topic origin/master
For release branch fixes, start the topic from
origin/release
, and by convention use a topic name starting inrelease-
:$ git checkout -b release-my-topic origin/release
If subdmodules may have changed, the run:
$ git submodule update
-
Edit files and create commits (repeat as needed):
$ edit file1 file2 file3 $ git add file1 file2 file3 $ git commit
Caveats:
- To add data follow these vtk instructions.
- To add icons, Kitware's graphic designer may be able to help create an SVG icon.
Commit messages must contain a brief description as the first line and a more detailed description of what the commit contains. If the commit contains a new feature, the detailed message must describe the new feature and why it is needed. If the commit contains a bug fix, the detailed message must describe the bug behavior, its underlying cause, and the approach to fix it. If the bug is described in the bug tracker, the commit message must contain a reference to the bug number.
-
Add some tests
- Start
paraview.exe -dr
to ignore prefs (disable registry) - Choose
Tools .. Record Test
to start. - Choose
Tools .. Lock View Size Custom...
- a 400x400 window works well. - Perform actions in the GUI that exercise your feature. Stop recording.
- Put the resulting XML file into
Clients/ParaView/Testing/XML
- Add it to CMakeLists.txt, probably in a TESTS_WITH_BASELINES section
- you can manually add
<pqcompareview>
for multiple image comparisons, then add to the TESTS_WITH_INLINE_COMPARES section
- you can manually add
- Follow the vtk instructions to add the baseline images, which live in
Testing/Data/Baseline/
.- Add your new baseline images to the list in
Testing/XML/CMakeLists.txt
- Add your new baseline images to the list in
- Add all testing files to your topic.
Some background is in the testing design wiki.
- Start
-
Add release notes
Notable changes should create a new file in
Documentation/release/dev/
namedmy-topic.md
(replacemy-topic
with the name of your topic). This is not necessary for branches which are "trivial" such as fixing typos, updating test baselines, or are developer-oriented.
When a topic is ready for review and possible inclusion, share it by pushing to a fork of your repository in GitLab. Be sure you have registered and signed in for GitLab Access and created your fork by visiting the main ParaView GitLab repository page and using the "Fork" button in the upper right.
-
Checkout the topic if it is not your current branch:
$ git checkout my-topic
-
Check what commits will be pushed to your fork in GitLab:
$ git prepush
-
Push commits in your topic branch to your fork in GitLab:
$ git gitlab-push
Notes:
- If you are revising a previously pushed topic and have rewritten the
topic history, add
-f
or--force
to overwrite the destination. - If the topic adds data see this note.
- The
gitlab-push
script also pushes themaster
branch to your fork in GitLab to keep it in sync with the upstreammaster
.
The output will include a link to the topic branch in your fork in GitLab and a link to a page for creating a Merge Request.
- If you are revising a previously pushed topic and have rewritten the
topic history, add
(If you already created a merge request for a given topic and have reached this step after revising it, skip to the next step.)
Visit your fork in GitLab, browse to the "Merge Requests" link on the left, and use the "New Merge Request" button in the upper right to reach the URL printed at the end of the previous step. It should be of the form:
https://gitlab.kitware.com/<username>/paraview/-/merge_requests/new
Follow these steps:
-
In the "Source branch" box select the
<username>/paraview
repository and themy-topic
branch. -
In the "Target branch" box select the
paraview/paraview
repository and themaster
branch. It should be the default.If your change is a fix for the
release
branch, you should still select themaster
branch as the target because the change needs to end up there too. -
Use the "Compare branches" button to proceed to the next page and fill out the merge request creation form.
-
In the "Title" field provide a one-line summary of the entire topic. This will become the title of the Merge Request.
Example Merge Request Title:
Wrapping: Add Java 1.x support
-
In the "Description" field provide a high-level description of the change the topic makes and any relevant information about how to try it.
- Use
@username
syntax to draw attention of specific developers. This syntax may be used anywhere outside literal text and code blocks. Or, wait until the next step and add comments to draw attention of developers. - If your change is a fix for the
release
branch, indicate this so that a maintainer knows it should be merged torelease
. - Optionally use a fenced code block with type
message
to specify text to be included in the generated merge commit message when the topic is merged.
Example Merge Request Description:
This branch requires Java 1.x which is not generally available yet. Get Java 1.x from ... in order to try these changes. ```message Add support for Java 1.x to the wrapping infrastructure. ``` Cc: @user1 @user2
- Use
-
The "Assign to", "Milestone", and "Labels" fields may be left blank.
-
Use the "Submit merge request" button to create the merge request and visit its page.
Add comments mentioning specific developers using @username
syntax to
draw their attention and have the topic reviewed. After typing @
and
some text, GitLab will offer completions for developers whose real names
or user names match.
Comments use GitLab Flavored Markdown for formatting. See GitLab documentation on Special GitLab References to add links to things like merge requests and commits in other repositories.
When a merge request is ready for review, developers can use the
triage:ready-for-review
to indicate the same to the reviewers. If reviewers
deems that it needs more work, they can add the triage:needswork
label.
This can be repeated as many times as needed adding/removing labels as
appropriate.
If a merge request is waiting on dashboards, use the triage:pending-dashboards
label.
Reviewers may add comments providing feedback or to acknowledge their approval. Lines of specific forms will be extracted during merging and included as trailing lines of the generated merge commit message:
The leading line of a comment may optionally be exactly one of the following votes followed by nothing but whitespace before the end of the line:
-1
or 👎 (:-1:
) means "The change is not ready for integration."+1
or 👍 (:+1:
) means "I like the change but defer to others."+2
means "The change is ready for integration."+3
means "I have tested the change and verified it works."
The middle lines of a comment may be free-form GitLab Flavored Markdown.
Zero or more trailing lines of a comment may each contain exactly one of the following votes followed by nothing but whitespace before the end of the line:
Rejected-by: me
means "The change is not ready for integration."Acked-by: me
means "I like the change but defer to others."Reviewed-by: me
means "The change is ready for integration."Tested-by: me
means "I have tested the change and verified it works."
Each me
reference may instead be an @username
reference or a full
Real Name <user@domain>
reference to credit someone else for performing
the review. References to me
and @username
will automatically be
transformed into a real name and email address according to the user's
GitLab account profile.
One may fetch the changes associated with a merge request by using
the git fetch
command line shown at the top of the Merge Request
page. It is of the form:
$ git fetch https://gitlab.kitware.com/$username/paraview.git $branch
This updates the local FETCH_HEAD
to refer to the branch.
There are a few options for checking out the changes in a work tree:
-
One may checkout the branch:
$ git checkout FETCH_HEAD -b $branch
or checkout the commit without creating a local branch:
$ git checkout FETCH_HEAD
-
Or, one may cherry-pick the commits to minimize rebuild time:
$ git cherry-pick ..FETCH_HEAD
The "Kitware Robot" automatically performs basic checks on the commits and adds a comment acknowledging or rejecting the topic. This will be repeated automatically whenever the topic is pushed to your fork again. A re-check may be explicitly requested by adding a comment with a single trailing line:
Do: check
A topic cannot be merged until the automatic review succeeds.
ParaView uses GitLab CI to test merge requests, configured by the top-level
.gitlab-ci.yml
file. Results may be seen both on the merge request's
pipeline page and on the ParaView CDash Page. Filtered CDash results
showing just the pipeline's jobs can be reached by selecting the cdash-commit
job in the External
stage of the pipeline. Note that due to GitLab changes,
the External
stage may be in a separate pipeline for the same commit.
Lint build jobs run automatically after every push. Heavier jobs require a manual trigger to run:
-
Merge request authors may visit their merge request's pipeline and click the "Play" button on one or more jobs manually. If the merge request has the "Allow commits from members who can merge to the target branch" check box enabled, ParaView maintainers may use the "Play" button too.
-
ParaView GitLab Project Developers may trigger CI on a merge request by adding a comment with a command among the comment trailing lines:
Do: test
@kwrobot
will add an award emoji to the comment to indicate that it was processed and also trigger all manual jobs in the merge request's pipeline.The
Do: test
command accepts the following arguments:-
--named <regex>
,-n <regex>
: Trigger jobs matching<regex>
anywhere in their name. Job names may be seen on the merge request's pipeline page. -
--stage <stage>
,-s <stage>
: Only affect jobs in a given stage. Stage names may be seen on the merge request's pipeline page. Note that the names are determined by what is in the.gitlab-ci.yml
file and may be capitalized in the web page, so lowercasing the webpage's display name for stages may be required. -
--action <action>
,-a <action>
: The action to perform on the jobs. Possible actions:manual
(the default): Start jobs awaiting manual interaction.unsuccessful
: Start or restart jobs which have not completed successfully.failed
: Restart jobs which have completed, but without success.completed
: Restart all completed jobs.
-
If the merge request topic branch is updated by a push, a new manual trigger using one of the above methods is needed to start CI again. Currently running jobs will generally be canceled automatically.
If a topic is approved during GitLab review, skip to the next step. Otherwise, revise the topic and push it back to GitLab for another review as follows:
-
Checkout the topic if it is not your current branch:
$ git checkout my-topic
-
To revise the
3
rd commit back on the topic:$ git rebase -i HEAD~3
(Substitute the correct number of commits back, as low as
1
.) Follow Git's interactive instructions. -
Return to the above step to share the revised topic.
After a topic has been reviewed and approved in a GitLab Merge Request, authorized developers may add a comment of the form
Do: merge
to ask that the change be merged into the upstream repository. By
convention, do not request a merge if any -1
or Rejected-by:
review comments have not been resolved and superseded by at least
+1
or Acked-by:
review comments from the same user.
Developers are encouraged to merge their own merge requests on review. However, please do not merge unless you are available to address any dashboard issues that may arise. Developers who repeatedly ignore dashboard issues following their merges may loose developer privileges to the repository temporarily (or permanently)!
If the merge succeeds the topic will appear in the upstream repository
master
branch and the Merge Request will be closed automatically.
Any issues associated with the Merge Request will generally get closed
automatically. If not, the developer merging the changes should close such issues
and add a workflow:customer-review
tag to the issue(s) addressed by the change.
Reporters and testers can then review the fix. Try to add enough information to
the Issue or the Merge Request to indicate how to test the functionality if not
obvious from the original Issue.
If the merge fails (likely due to a conflict), a comment will be added describing the failure. In the case of a conflict, fetch the latest upstream history and rebase on it:
$ git fetch origin
$ git rebase origin/master
(If you are fixing a bug in the latest release then substitute
origin/release
for origin/master
.)
Return to the above step to share the revised topic.
After a topic has been merged upstream the Merge Request will be closed. Now you may delete your copies of the branch.
-
In the GitLab Merge Request page a "Remove Source Branch" button will appear. Use it to delete the
my-topic
branch from your fork in GitLab. -
In your work tree checkout and update the
master
branch:$ git checkout master $ git pull
-
Delete the local topic branch:
$ git branch -d my-topic
The
branch -d
command works only when the topic branch has been correctly merged. Use-D
instead of-d
to force the deletion of an unmerged topic branch (warning - you could lose commits).
If you have any VTK changes, then you are required to get your changes incorporated into VTK using VTK's development workflow. Once your VTK topic has been approved and merged into VTK, then:
-
Create a ParaView topic if you haven't already.
-
Add your VTK topic head (or the latest VTK origin/master which includes your VTK topic head).
$ cd VTK $ git checkout master $ cd .. $ git add VTK $ git commit
-
Follow the merge process documented earlier.