You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Describe the bug
We are implementing the open-source solution into our Gitlab environment and re-engineering the setup to work through its CI/CD Pipeline. we have had a lot of testing success, and have been interested incorporating the import process into a workflow. We are running into issues when the command runs through.
Wondering if a AWS SCP is configured wrong from the expected formatting or what I might be missing.
Community Engagement
Your vote counts! Please support this bug report by adding a 👍 reaction to the original issue, which will aid the community and maintainers in addressing this problem.
Please refrain from adding "+1" or "me too" comments, as these create unnecessary noise for issue followers and do not help in prioritizing the issue. If you wish to contribute to solving this issue or have submitted a pull request, please leave a comment.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Describe the bug
We are implementing the open-source solution into our Gitlab environment and re-engineering the setup to work through its CI/CD Pipeline. we have had a lot of testing success, and have been interested incorporating the import process into a workflow. We are running into issues when the command runs through.
Error Message:
2024/06/26 14:12:59 [error ] Unhandled Exception
error=ValidationError(model='ServiceControlPolicyItem', errors=[{'loc': ('Description',), 'msg': 'field required', 'type': 'value_error.missing'}])
exception=ValidationError
Wondering if a AWS SCP is configured wrong from the expected formatting or what I might be missing.
Community Engagement
Your vote counts! Please support this bug report by adding a 👍 reaction to the original issue, which will aid the community and maintainers in addressing this problem.
Please refrain from adding "+1" or "me too" comments, as these create unnecessary noise for issue followers and do not help in prioritizing the issue. If you wish to contribute to solving this issue or have submitted a pull request, please leave a comment.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: