Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Expose SubjectGroup as a column in participant-level results TSV #72

Open
alyssadai opened this issue Sep 19, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Expose SubjectGroup as a column in participant-level results TSV #72

alyssadai opened this issue Sep 19, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
feat:improve Incremental, user facing improvements of an existing feature. someday Not a priority right now, but we want to keep this around to think or discuss more. type:feature Effort to deliver new features, feature changes & improvements

Comments

@alyssadai
Copy link
Contributor

alyssadai commented Sep 19, 2023

The API already returns subject_group as part of the "subject_data" key in the response object. The query tool should expose this information to the user as part of the participant-level downloads.

This way when users query for healthy controls, there is some explicit evidence (besides/in addition to their Diagnosis being empty) that the matched subjects are indeed healthy controls in our graph.

@alyssadai alyssadai added feat:improve Incremental, user facing improvements of an existing feature. type:feature Effort to deliver new features, feature changes & improvements labels Sep 19, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link

We want to keep our issues up to date and active. This issue hasn't seen any activity in the last 30 days.
We have applied the _flag:stale label to indicate that this issue should be reviewed again.
When you review, please reread the spec and then apply one of these three options:

  • prioritize: apply the flag:schedule label to suggest moving this issue into the backlog now
  • close: if the issue is no longer relevant, explain why (give others a chance to reply) and then close.
  • archive: sometimes an issue has important information or ideas but we won't work on it soon. In this case
    apply the someday label to show that this won't be prioritized. The stalebot will ignore issues with this
    label in the future. Use sparingly!

@github-actions github-actions bot added the _flag:stale [BOT ONLY] Flag issue that hasn't been updated in a while and needs to be triaged again label Oct 20, 2023
@surchs surchs added flag:discuss Flag issue that needs to be discussed before it can be implemented. and removed flag:discuss Flag issue that needs to be discussed before it can be implemented. labels Oct 24, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the _flag:stale [BOT ONLY] Flag issue that hasn't been updated in a while and needs to be triaged again label Oct 25, 2023
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 9, 2024

We want to keep our issues up to date and active. This issue hasn't seen any activity in the last 75 days.
We have applied the _flag:stale label to indicate that this issue should be reviewed again.
When you review, please reread the spec and then apply one of these three options:

  • prioritize: apply the flag:schedule label to suggest moving this issue into the backlog now
  • close: if the issue is no longer relevant, explain why (give others a chance to reply) and then close.
  • archive: sometimes an issue has important information or ideas but we won't work on it soon. In this case
    apply the someday label to show that this won't be prioritized. The stalebot will ignore issues with this
    label in the future. Use sparingly!

@github-actions github-actions bot added the _flag:stale [BOT ONLY] Flag issue that hasn't been updated in a while and needs to be triaged again label Jan 9, 2024
@surchs surchs added the someday Not a priority right now, but we want to keep this around to think or discuss more. label Mar 9, 2024
@surchs surchs transferred this issue from neurobagel/old-query-tool Mar 9, 2024
@surchs surchs removed the _flag:stale [BOT ONLY] Flag issue that hasn't been updated in a while and needs to be triaged again label Apr 18, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feat:improve Incremental, user facing improvements of an existing feature. someday Not a priority right now, but we want to keep this around to think or discuss more. type:feature Effort to deliver new features, feature changes & improvements
Projects
Status: No status
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants