-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 229
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Does this gem support "setex" call #205
Labels
Comments
madeyemoody85
changed the title
Does this gem supports "setex" call
Does this gem support "setex" call
Feb 10, 2017
I do not believe this is currently supported, but it seems like a great
addition. I would be willing to accept a patch with tests to add this
functionality. We would probably need to check for the version of Redis,
and/or for the existence of SETEX to support older Redis servers.
…On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 7:54 AM Nachiket Londhe ***@***.***> wrote:
I have a use case where I would like to use "SETEX" call to set the key
with expiration in single call. Currently I am doing this in two separate
calls and if possible I would like to avoid one extra call to redis
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#205>, or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAcoOZf8JUpDxnsSr1Xsp7A-OVgzwzdks5rbIhNgaJpZM4L9iHE>
.
|
Great I will try my best to get it out this week end, take a look if you
would like
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Nate Wiger <[email protected]>
wrote:
… I do not believe this is currently supported, but it seems like a great
addition. I would be willing to accept a patch with tests to add this
functionality. We would probably need to check for the version of Redis,
and/or for the existence of SETEX to support older Redis servers.
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 7:54 AM Nachiket Londhe ***@***.***>
wrote:
> I have a use case where I would like to use "SETEX" call to set the key
> with expiration in single call. Currently I am doing this in two separate
> calls and if possible I would like to avoid one extra call to redis
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <#205>, or mute the
thread
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-
auth/AAAcoOZf8JUpDxnsSr1Xsp7A-OVgzwzdks5rbIhNgaJpZM4L9iHE>
> .
>
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#205 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AQSGphEWxnW3ZQUpRsT5ShC8VB4WYt6Cks5rbJTxgaJpZM4L9iHE>
.
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
I have a use case where I would like to use "SETEX" call to set the key with expiration in single call. Currently I am doing this in two separate calls and if possible I would like to avoid one extra call to redis
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: