UG not consistent with DG

[nananakx-x]

I think it will be better to include under the rm command in UG that rm ~/grp-002 (other than just rm grp-002) will be valid too, like how it's mentioned in DG.

[soc-pe-bot]

Team's Response

• In the section of acceptable values for each parameters in the UG, we mentioned all the possible values the path parameter can take.
• Adding all possible permutations of the same command may result in many repeated lines which we deemed unnecessary.
• For the purpose of the UG we wanted to maximise readability, whereas in the DG it was more important to be precise.

Items for the Tester to Verify

❓ Issue response

Team chose [response.NotInScope]

• I disagree

Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]

---