Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

exact rational input? #1

Open
dimpase opened this issue Jul 16, 2018 · 6 comments
Open

exact rational input? #1

dimpase opened this issue Jul 16, 2018 · 6 comments

Comments

@dimpase
Copy link

dimpase commented Jul 16, 2018

Is it possible to accept exact rational input?

If not, is there any limit on the size of integers one can have in .dat files?

@nakatamaho
Copy link
Owner

Hi dimpase! thanks for using SDPA-GMP

  1. Unfortunately, not.
  2. I've never tried. I tried over 100 decimal digits, and it was okay

@dimpase
Copy link
Author

dimpase commented Aug 7, 2018

Oh well. In SPDs I have (very badly conditioned) I end up with errors in Cholesky factorisation saying something like "matrix ix not positive semidefinite".

Could it be that some precision is checked using the doubles rather than arbitrary precision?

@nakatamaho
Copy link
Owner

Hi dimpase,
Yes, you can control using 'precision' parameter in param.sdpa .

@dimpase
Copy link
Author

dimpase commented Aug 7, 2018

No matter how big I make it, it seems not being enough. Perhaps I should really try huge values...

@nakatamaho
Copy link
Owner

Hi dimpase, could you please send me your logs to [email protected]?
thanks
Nakata Maho

@dimpase
Copy link
Author

dimpase commented Aug 7, 2018

I will try to reproduce this on the hardware I have with me (I am on vacation, and do not have access to the machine I used to compute these). It might take a bit of time.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants