Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Firefox will consider a Rust implementation of JPEG-XL #1064

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 4, 2024
+1 −1
Merged

Firefox will consider a Rust implementation of JPEG-XL #1064

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
a14f900
Firefox will consider a memory-safe Rust implementation of JPEG-XL
bholley Sep 3, 2024
32752f3
Update activities.json
bholley Sep 4, 2024
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion activities.json
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -955,7 +955,7 @@
"mdnUrl": null,
"mozBugUrl": "https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1539075",
"mozPosition": "neutral",
"mozPositionDetail": "JPEG-XL includes features and performance that might differentiate it from other formats, but the benefits it provides are not significant enough on their own to justify the cost of adding another raster image format to the Web.",
"mozPositionDetail": "JPEG-XL includes features and performance that might differentiate it from other formats, but the benefits it provides are not significant enough on their own to justify the cost of adding another C++ image decoder to browsers. A memory-safe decoder would reduce these costs considerably, and we are open to shipping one that meets our requirements.",
"mozPositionIssue": 522,
"org": "Other",
"title": "JPEG-XL",
Expand Down
Loading