-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature: Pupil Deconvolution (port from pyeparse) #12505
Open
scott-huberty
wants to merge
8
commits into
mne-tools:main
Choose a base branch
from
scott-huberty:deconvolution
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+363
−6
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This basically ports the code from pyeparse, with slight updates to work with mne and match mne and modern python conventions.
scott-huberty
requested review from
larsoner,
drammock,
agramfort and
dengemann
as code owners
March 18, 2024 22:45
6 tasks
scott-huberty
changed the title
Feature: Pupil Deconvolution (port from prepares)
Feature: Pupil Deconvolution (port from pyeparse)
Mar 19, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A couple of nitpick, questions, but it looks great, don't forget to add a changelog entry!
Thanks @scott-huberty
larsoner
reviewed
Mar 19, 2024
From Mathieu and Eric Co-authored-by: Mathieu Scheltienne <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Eric Larson <[email protected]>
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
Was causing a circular import error in https://github.com/mne-tools/mne-python/actions/runs/8347127725/job/22846082215?pr=12505
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Scheltienne <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Reference issue
This PR implements the last feature proposed for my GSoC in #11879 that I didn't get to over the summer.
What does this implement/fix?
This basically ports the pupil deconvolution code from (the unmaintained?) https://github.com/pyeparse/pyeparse , and which was used for @larsoner and @drammock 's pupil deconvolution paper in 2016.
Additional information
I made some minor changes to the code and docstring to work with MNE's API and follow MNE conventions (and make the code more modern i.e. use format specifiers instead of percent specifiers).
To check that the ported code in this branch behaves similarly to the code in pyeparse, I re-ran the scripts to deconvolve the data and generate
figure 3
in Dan and Eric's paper (The original scripts used the deconvolution method frompyeparse
, and I updated the scripts to use the MNE API in this branch:Possible Alternatives
I have not opened an issue for deconvolution specifically, so if there are concerns about merging this into MNE or other ideas, don't hesitate to share.