You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, the library allows for things like cheese and -cheese to be inputted, and doesn't reason about the semantic meaning of having a property and its negation both present. There's also no duplicate checking.
If we were to add duplicate checking, would we want to perform that automatically in an opinionated way? Or should it be user-configured?
How do we want to handle user input vs programmatic input? What kind of errors can we surface to the calling context which can help make the UX feel right?
Currently, the library allows for things like
cheese
and-cheese
to be inputted, and doesn't reason about the semantic meaning of having a property and its negation both present. There's also no duplicate checking.If we were to add duplicate checking, would we want to perform that automatically in an opinionated way? Or should it be user-configured?
How do we want to handle user input vs programmatic input? What kind of errors can we surface to the calling context which can help make the UX feel right?
example of where this has caused issues in the past:
https://github.com/mixmaxhq/app/pull/7505/files#diff-d32a3e6004a682c216ff83320b43464dR234 (private to Mixmaxers)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: