diff --git a/casestudies/mcode_codex.html b/casestudies/mcode_codex.html index 51e7be7..71d0ad1 100644 --- a/casestudies/mcode_codex.html +++ b/casestudies/mcode_codex.html @@ -307,62 +307,56 @@
Between 2019 and 2024, the CodeX Community and colleagues improved and leveraged mCODE to address difficult problems in oncology, substantially improving cancer care and research. The cardiology and genomics communities are starting their CodeX journey. For additional, new specialties considering following the mCODE / CodeX experience, here the five most important first steps to consider:
-Sharing the CodeX Community’s and other experience deploying oncology data standards that solve real-world challenges in patient care and research.
-Inviting all medical specialties to learn from and join the mission.
+Sharing the CodeX Community’s experience deploying oncology data standards that solve real-world challenges in patient care and research.
+All medical specialties are invited to learn from and join the mission.
@@ -61,23 +61,29 @@Today, a patient’s health story is nearly impossible to gather and share because data are unreliable, stored in different locations, lack standardization, and are largely unusable.
-The CodeX HL7 Accelerator is a member-driven - community that is breaking down silos endemic to our current system - for specialty health data. The initial projects within CodeX worked to - solve problems in the cancer space, building and leveraging the - minimal Common Oncology Data Elements (mCODE) standard. Now, the - expanding CodeX community is also addressing problems in the - cardiovascular disease and genomics domains.
Circumstances across the - health landscape are converging to make today, finally, the right time - for all medical specialties to standardize health data and deploy - solutions to their most challenges problems. It’s hoped that the CodeX - experience shared on this site will speed the work of other - specialties. It’s also hoped that aligning future work with the CodeX - approach will help ensure that specialty-based efforts are done in a - consistent manner that enables every person to have a coherent, - lifetime Standard Health Record that improves health care and research - for all.
Today, a patient’s health story is nearly impossible to gather and share because data are unreliable, stored in different locations, lack standardization, and are largely unusable.
+The CodeX HL7 Accelerator is a member-driven + community that is breaking down silos endemic to our current system + for specialty health data. The initial projects within CodeX worked to + solve problems in the cancer space, building and leveraging the + minimal Common Oncology Data Elements (mCODE) standard. Now, the + expanding CodeX community is also addressing problems in the + cardiovascular disease and genomics domains. +
+Circumstances across the + health landscape are converging to make this time in history, finally, the right time + for all medical specialties to standardize health data and deploy + standards-based solutions to their most challenges problems. It’s hoped that the CodeX + experience shared on this site will speed the work of other + specialties. It’s also hoped that aligning future specialty standards development with the CodeX + approach will help ensure that new efforts are implemented + consistently, so that every person will have a coherent, cross-specialty, + lifetime Standard Health Record that improves care and research for all. +
+Projects that have used the principles and best practices covered in the Playbook.
Learn how developing a core set of structured data elements for oncology electronic health records changed oncology research.
-Learn how the CodeX Community was created and is implementing a standard, core set of data elements that are changing oncology care and research.
+Development of FHIR standard for a core set of common data elements for cardiovascular health.
-Development of FHIR standard for a core set of common data elements for cardiovascular health.
+Streamlining transitions of care and care coordination between post-acute care (PAC) and other providers, patients, and key stakeholders through FHIR.
-Streamlining transitions of care and care coordination between post-acute care (PAC) and other providers, patients, and key stakeholders through FHIR.
+Gathering the right organizations and people has been the most foundational and challenging track in the CodeX Playbook.
-It’s very likely that almost everyone reviewing this site agree that enabling true health data interoperability is more a social challenge, than a medical or technical challenge. It takes people who share a vision and mission, can align different views of how to get there, and invest the resources needed to change the status quo such that the mission gains sufficient momentum to substantially improve health for everyone.
+It’s very likely that almost everyone reviewing this site agrees that enabling true health data interoperability is more a social challenge, than a medical or technical challenge. It takes people who share a vision and mission, can align different views of how to get there, and invest the resources needed to change the status quo such that the mission gains sufficient momentum to substantially improve health for everyone.
Actions that CodeX has found indispensable include (a) Champions, (b) Governance, and (c) Community Growth. These actions are expanded upon below.
@@ -118,11 +118,12 @@For Use Case projects to progress from a vision to adoption and value in the real world, a variety of organizations and skillsets are needed. Thus, the community must be grown such that there are participants with direct experience related to each of the envisioned roles Use Cases.
For example, in the CodeX Radiation Therapy Case Study [NOTE: Link to a Case Study part of the website?], the team included radiation therapy societies, health systems, radiation oncologists, radiation physicists, payers, and vendor. Skillsets included clinical practice, physics, software engineering, informaticists, FHIR developers, HL7 standards process experts, etc. Getting the right set of people together at the right times in the process can be challenging. It’s ideal to have redundancy among these roles, in case some people have to reduce their effort.
The good news is that a promising Use Case has the potential to attract new participants. These participants appreciate the potential value of the work, are willing to invest resources to realize that value, and want to be at the table where decisions are made and work is executed.
-CodeX experience suggests that different value propositions stakeholders that often apply to different stakeholders. The following generalizes the values to a Use Case for involvement six different types of stakeholders, and the value propositions that often resonate with the same stakeholders.
+CodeX experience suggests that different value propositions often resonate with different stakeholders. The following generalizes the values to a specialty data standardization initiative for involvement six different types of stakeholders, and the value propositions that often resonate with the same stakeholders.
+Value to the SHR initiative of this stakeholder’s engagement
+Value to the specialty standardization initiative of engagement by these stakeholders
Value to this stakeholder to engage in the SHR Initiative
+Value to these stakeholders to engage in the specialty initiative
Value to the SHR initiative of this stakeholder’s engagement
+Value to the specialty standardization initiative of engagement by these stakeholder
Value to this stakeholder to engage in the SHR Initiative
+Value to these stakeholders to engage in the specialty initiative
Value to the SHR initiative of this stakeholder’s engagement
+Value to the specialty standardization initiative of engagement by these stakeholders
Value to this stakeholder to engage in the SHR Initiative
+Value to these stakeholders to engage in the specialty initiative
- Value to the SHR initiative of this stakeholder’s engagement + Value to the specialty standardization initiative of engagement by these stakeholders
- Value to this stakeholder to engage in the SHR Initiative + Value to these stakeholders to engage in the specialty initiative
Value to the SHR initiative of this stakeholder’s engagement
+Value to the specialty standardization initiative of engagement by these stakeholders
- Value to this stakeholder to engage in the SHR Initiative + Value to these stakeholders to engage in the specialty initiative
Value to the SHR initiative of this stakeholder’s engagement
+Value to the specialty standardization initiative of engagement by these stakeholders
Value to this stakeholder to engage in the SHR Initiative
+Value to these stakeholders to engage in the specialty initiative
The CodeX HL7 FHIR Accelerator Community has gathered substantial experience in not only a developing global data standard for cancer care – the minimal Common Oncology Data Elements (mCODE) – but also deploying and demonstrating value for solving specific problems faced by cancer patients and others. These outcomes and the experience gained are shared on this site so other specialties might learn, and even collaborate, so that the sum of standards created for multiple specialties enables every person to have a coherent, lifetime Standard Health Record that improves health care and research for all. -
- +The CodeX HL7 FHIR Accelerator Community has gathered substantial experience in not only a developing global data standard for cancer care – the minimal Common Oncology Data Elements (mCODE) – but also deploying and demonstrating value for solving specific problems faced by cancer patients and others. These outcomes and the experience gained are shared on this site so other specialties might learn, and even collaborate, so that the sum of standards created for multiple specialties enables every person to have a coherent, lifetime Standard Health Record that improves health care and research for all.
+The CodeX HL7 FHIR Accelerator Community has gathered substantial experience in a developing global data standard for cancer care – the minimal Common Oncology Data Elements (mCODE). CodeX has also gained experience deploying and demonstrating the value of mCODE for solving specific problems faced by cancer patients and others stakeholders. These outcomes and the experience are shared on this site to help other specialties leverage what’s been learned. If specialties could follow the CodeX approach in a collaborative way, this could help ensure that the sum of standards created across multiple specialties enables every person to have a coherent, lifetime Standard Health Record that improves health care and research for all.
The approach that has emerged from the CodeX Community can be summarized along five tracks that typically overlap in time and evolve with experience:
This site also provides a Getting Started set of the five most important considerations [currently slide 7 – or could summarize this in a list of titles here], from the CodeX experience, for those potentially getting ready to start work on a new specialty. Background on the CodeX Community, mCODE standard, and the Case Study around the evolution of both and deployment in the real world are also summarized here.
+This site also provides a Getting Started set of the five most important considerations, from the CodeX/mCODE experience, for those potentially getting ready to start work on a new specialty.
+The CodeX Specialty Playbook is a useful set of steps to help future health specialties to succeed in creating and adopting standard health data elements for their domain.
-- “Impactful quote goes here.” - Famous Person, CompanyName -- +
The CodeX Specialty Playbook aims to be a useful set of steps to help future health specialties to succeed in creating and adopting standard health data elements for their domain.
The success of the CodeX oncology stakeholders to build out Use Case projects around mCODE, and the increasing adoption of CodeX Use Case workflows based on mCODE has led other specialties to ask questions such as: What are CodeX and mCODE? What impact are they having? How and why did you proceed the way you did? How could my specialty replicate your success or even collaborate? These questions are some of the motivations that led to this site.
-Also, the time is right for other specialties to create FHIR-based standards to address challenges. Patients, providers, payer, researchers and others are realizing the need for standards that provide semantic interoperability (and the costs of not using such standards). Recent Government rules and regulations are driving a common unpinning – like USCDI, FHIR, US Core, TEFCA [spell out and link?] – for future specialty standards. Vendors are working to meet customer demands and Government direction, delivering products increasingly based on standards. Formerly disparate elements are converging.
- +Increasing adoption of CodeX Use Case workflows based on mCODE has led other specialties to ask questions such as: What are CodeX and mCODE? What impact are they having? How and why did you proceed the way you did? How could my specialty replicate your success or even collaborate? These questions are some of the motivations that led to this site.
+Also, the time is right for other specialties to create FHIR-based standards to address challenges. Patients, providers, payer, researchers and others are realizing the need for standards that provide semantic interoperability. Recent Government rules and regulations are driving a common underpinning – like USCDI, FHIR, US Core, TEFCA - for future specialty standards. Vendors are working to meet customer demands and Government direction, delivering products increasingly based on standards. Formerly disparate elements are converging.
This site is intended to be helpful for a range of organizations and people. The site should help specialty leaders considering replicating the model pioneered by the CodeX for their domain and/or working more closely with CodeX and other specialties to speed work and increase coherency. Parts of the site may be particularly useful to stakeholders (e.g., patient organizations, specialty societies, government agencies, payers, vendors, etc.) and roles (e.g., decision makers, project managers, clinical experts, informaticists, system engineers, etc.) involved in just a subset of the spectrum of all future work.
The core of this site provides background on each of the five tracks, honed over time, that provide a framework for and facilitate CodeX work. [NOTE: slide 5 – suggest the graphic provide links to sections that go into more detail on each track]. Also provided are Case Studies with the history of activities, outcomes, and implications that may be useful for new specialties.
+The core of this site provides background on each of the five tracks, honed over time, that provide a framework for and facilitate CodeX work. Also provided are Case Studies with the history of activities, outcomes, and implications that may be useful for new specialties.
-