- No tap-tester test
- No features that sourcerer doesn’t have (lock down the version via
the api-version header)
We think this should be possible with the current oauth-flow. We will fail fast if that turns out not to be the case and fall back to authenticating via their token.
- !!! We could really use an alpha tester but it’s not necessary. We only need to deliver something we think will probably work rather than something we’re pretty sure will work!
- !!! We should not do field selection. It makes the sync logic much harder as you have a combinatoric situation of what among Events + Objects is selected and what records to emit because of it!
- !!! Sourcerer stripe does not implement 429 support!
- !!! Sourcerer does not update all objects. Only
InvoiceItems
,Invoices
,Coupons
,Plans
,Customers
,Transfers
, andCharges
.Is it possible that retrieving an object by ID merges all updates to it into its state but retrieving the same object from the Object’s stream has it as it was created?
- @brian Do we need docs according to the contract?
Start with the assumption that we’ll be collecting a
This is when we decide whether we can get the account-id or not.
# in orca
./run_it check <conn_id>
We need at this point to be using the account_id
property or the
api_key
property.
This is probably good enough to do with an
stripe.Account.retrieve(account_id)
call.
Log the name, etc. of the account we retrieved.
Need to be sure to use the stable version of the API that we are currently using. Allowing customer specification of the API version needs to come later because it introduces too much uncertainty.
Always selected. We will do field selection later.
Notably, we do not get updates for Charges at this time.
This should be in line with the spike for =timeout=.
This is not a strict requirement because sourcerer doesn’t handle it. But we think it’s super easy.
This is object cursor id pagination. See sdk.py.
Because we are not doing field selection, this part will be easy.
@brian: Do we have any reason to believe that field selection could be complicated for this tap? Are their field exclusions, etc?
The schema may be tricky here. There are many deeply nested objects (See https://github.com/stitchdata/sourcerer/blob/f828820666363f15ab47bcff3a883f9fb14791f3/sourcerer/src/clojure/sourcerer/apis/datatype/stripe.clj#L113) but all of the data typing concerns appear to be around datetime parsing. We’ll need to put that in by hand unfortunately.
How does sourcerer handle resetting your bookmark?