Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add optional configuration to support binding objects to XML using Jackson XML #275

Closed
graemerocher opened this issue Jun 8, 2018 · 3 comments
Closed

Add optional configuration to support binding objects to XML using Jackson XML #275

graemerocher opened this issue Jun 8, 2018 · 3 comments
Labels
type: enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@graemerocher
Copy link
Contributor

Some folks are still interested in consuming and exposing XML APIs.

We should add an optional module for this based off https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-dataformat-xml

This would involve adding a XmlCodec (equivalent to JsonCodec) and beans for the XmlMapper etc.
@graemerocher graemerocher added the type: enhancement New feature or request label Jun 8, 2018
@ilopmar ilopmar added the status: awaiting third-party Awaiting changes to a third party library label Jun 18, 2018
@ilopmar
Copy link
Contributor

ilopmar commented Jun 18, 2018

Pending on this: FasterXML/jackson-dataformat-xml#260

@ilopmar
Copy link
Contributor

ilopmar commented Jun 19, 2018

The configuration:jackson-xml project and a basic version to produce XML is in this branch: https://github.com/micronaut-projects/micronaut-core/commits/issue-275-xml

@jameskleeh
Copy link
Contributor

Closed by https://github.com/micronaut-projects/micronaut-jackson-xml

@jameskleeh jameskleeh removed the status: awaiting third-party Awaiting changes to a third party library label Feb 14, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
type: enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@graemerocher @ilopmar @jameskleeh