Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Allowing passing a list of objects to the rule engine #6

Open
rover886 opened this issue Oct 20, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Allowing passing a list of objects to the rule engine #6

rover886 opened this issue Oct 20, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
Discovery This means feature request is not yet clear and need some more exploration around the topic.

Comments

@rover886
Copy link
Collaborator

One of the user come up with this idea along with typical use case: person can sign a contract. Then in fact the input would be the contract, the list of employees to choose from and the output should be a list of employees that can sign.
@rover886 rover886 added the Discovery This means feature request is not yet clear and need some more exploration around the topic. label Oct 20, 2023
@keving119
Copy link

Hi, any update on this issue?

@kleineroscar
Copy link

I think a better way of handling this use-case is to use an additional dummy attribute that contains the result of the condition(s). Then in your microflow you can filter for the attribute value

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Discovery This means feature request is not yet clear and need some more exploration around the topic.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@rover886 @keving119 @kleineroscar