Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

please port to SDL2 #5

Open
a-detiste opened this issue Jun 23, 2023 · 8 comments
Open

please port to SDL2 #5

a-detiste opened this issue Jun 23, 2023 · 8 comments

Comments

@a-detiste
Copy link

a-detiste commented Jun 23, 2023

https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1038514

@mathstuf
Copy link
Owner

@mathstuf
Copy link
Owner

@a-detiste
Copy link
Author

a-detiste commented Jun 25, 2023

So just please publish a release :-)

@mathstuf
Copy link
Owner

I've never published a release; if Debian is fine using a snapshot from whenever, they should be happy using a snapshot from today too.

@a-detiste
Copy link
Author

Someone needs to package cmake-d first.

And I still haven't found this one last missign piece

CMake Error at src/CMakeLists.txt:6 (find_package):
  By not providing "Findbulletml.cmake" in CMAKE_MODULE_PATH this project has                                                                                                                 
  asked CMake to find a package configuration file provided by "bulletml",                                                                                                                    
  but CMake did not find one.                                                                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                                                                              
  Could not find a package configuration file provided by "bulletml" with any                                                                                                                 
  of the following names:                                                                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                                                                              
    bulletmlConfig.cmake                                                                                                                                                                      
    bulletml-config.cmake  

@a-detiste
Copy link
Author

OK found your fork https://github.com/mathstuf/bulletml, please release that too.

@a-detiste
Copy link
Author

We'll need to test the other games against this new BulletML: parsec47, rrootage, torus-trooper, tumiki-fighters, val-and-rick; so it does is important to have well-versionned artefact.

@mathstuf
Copy link
Owner

I've not touched these in my "modernization" interests:

parsec47, rrootage, torus-trooper, tumiki-fighters

They may well uncover all kinds of fun bugs in the library too as mucade doesn't use all that many features in its scripts.

This is news to me; I've not heard of it before:

val-and-rick

OK found your fork https://github.com/mathstuf/bulletml, please release that too.

This is known to have some serious crashes when using it for extended periods of time (AFAICT, the GC loses track of pointers in the way I was using it leading to the typical memory corruption errors that result from broken pointer logic). Maybe more modern D fixes it; no idea.

Someone needs to package cmake-d first.

Have at it: https://github.com/mathstuf/cmake/tree/d_support. I have no plans to rebase it onto a more modern CMake at this time though. Contributing dub support may be more worthwhile at this point.

I may get time to review things if someone puts up PRs, but it's really not a high-priority thing right now.

As for tags, I can push them. Please let me know if master is sufficient across the board though.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants