Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The usage of TriPepSVM about new taxon ids. #2

Open
xj7757417771 opened this issue May 5, 2019 · 1 comment
Open

The usage of TriPepSVM about new taxon ids. #2

xj7757417771 opened this issue May 5, 2019 · 1 comment

Comments

@xj7757417771
Copy link

Hello,
I recently used your TriPepSVM to predict RBPs, but the species used included A.thaliana and S.cerevisiae. The taxon ids were 3702 and 4932, respectivel through uniprot, but I got errors as follows:
Python: can't open file 'get_rbps_for_taxon.py': [Errno 2] No such file or directory
Fatal Error:
Failed to open the database file
Program halted !!
Rm: cannot remove ‘non-RBP/A//allData/RBP_3702.fasta.clstr’: No such file or directory

But on human species, it works fine.

The code I run is as follows:
./TriPepSVM.sh -i non-RBP/S.cerevisiae-non-RBP135 -o non-RBP/S/ -id 4932 -pos 1.8 -neg 0.2 -thr 0.68
I don't know where the problem is?

Looking forward to your reply, thank you.

Juan Xie

@bressin
Copy link
Contributor

bressin commented May 6, 2019

Hi Juan Xie,

Thank you for pointing this out. We fixed the bug. Please pull or download the new version.

However, you should be aware of two other "issues":

  1. The class weights from the paper are optimized for human, salmonella and e.coli. We recommend you to use the inverse proportional feature weight (default) for a new taxon or you should optimize them by your own.

  2. The taxonomy "4932" has just a few directly annotated RNA-binding proteins. Please try -r TRUE and/or a higher taxon order to enable classification.

Have fun!

Annkatrin Bressin

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants