You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I haven't really looked up the numbers, but do you think this aerospike fan can have a higher thrust to weight ratio than a conventional propellor in a quad copter drone? I don't really know the figures, but if the mass flow rate is comparable to a conventional prop while having a significantly higher exhaust velocity, would it be possible that this can compensate for its additional weight and have a overall higher thrust to weight ratio?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
I haven't really looked up the numbers, but do you think this aerospike fan can have a higher thrust to weight ratio than a conventional propellor in a quad copter drone? I don't really know the figures, but if the mass flow rate is comparable to a conventional prop while having a significantly higher exhaust velocity, would it be possible that this can compensate for its additional weight and have a overall higher thrust to weight ratio?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions