You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When listing the population data for an admin boundary in a pivot table it defaults to the Total operator. However this sums up the population allocated for the level as well as all the levels below it, leading to a much inflated figure. Selecting 'Max' is a workaround for at least the second-lowest and lowest levels, but it's not intuitive for users to select that.
We need a more intuitive alternative for bringing through only the level-appropriate pop data.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
When listing the population data for an admin boundary in a pivot table it defaults to the Total operator. However this sums up the population allocated for the level as well as all the levels below it, leading to a much inflated figure. Selecting 'Max' is a workaround for at least the second-lowest and lowest levels, but it's not intuitive for users to select that.
We need a more intuitive alternative for bringing through only the level-appropriate pop data.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: