Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FR: Support for dataview fields #9

Open
isle9 opened this issue Jun 22, 2022 · 15 comments
Open

FR: Support for dataview fields #9

isle9 opened this issue Jun 22, 2022 · 15 comments
Labels
feature request New feature or request waiting on upstream change there is an upstream change that needs to happen before this can be worked on

Comments

@isle9
Copy link

isle9 commented Jun 22, 2022

Are there any plans to support dataview fields?

@isle9 isle9 added the feature request New feature or request label Jun 22, 2022
@mProjectsCode
Copy link
Owner

I personally haven't looked into data view fields, since I don't use them, but I can put it on the road map.

@isle9
Copy link
Author

isle9 commented Jul 2, 2022

Any updates on this? Have you checked the dataview API?

@mProjectsCode
Copy link
Owner

not yet, there are currently other things I am working on (templates and the docs)

@Rhydderch
Copy link

I would love to have this feature as well. (and congrats on this plugin; it's something I've always wanted=)

@mProjectsCode
Copy link
Owner

I am currently working on a library for plugin devs, that provides utility for editing metadata. Dataview fields are on the roadmap for that.
Once that library is finished I will update this plugin to use it.

@Rhydderch
Copy link

Rhydderch commented Oct 16, 2022 via email

@mayurankv
Copy link

Is there any update on that? (Also can't believe I'm only just discovering this plugin!).

@mProjectsCode
Copy link
Owner

To keep it simple: The plugin will only support dataview inline fields, once dataview makes it's inline field parser and API available for other plugins to use. As, for a multitude of reasons, I don't want to write my own dataview inline field parser.

@mayurankv
Copy link

Of course! Fingers crossed on this from dv's side then.

@mProjectsCode mProjectsCode added the wontfix This will not be worked on label Jun 1, 2023
@alexey-zaharchenko
Copy link

hi, the Dataview inline fields API is indirectly available through a plugin called MetaEdit. It's one of the "Friends of Dataview" plugins, afaik it used by all other plugins that require access to Dataview fields.

@mProjectsCode
Copy link
Owner

I don't want to rely on a third plugin.
I have my hopes up that datacore exposes an API for inline fields.

@mProjectsCode mProjectsCode added waiting on upstream change there is an upstream change that needs to happen before this can be worked on and removed wontfix This will not be worked on labels Jan 4, 2024
@dxcore35
Copy link

dxcore35 commented May 5, 2024

Hello it is May 2024, the dataview support will be amazing!
Is this implemented? #107 (comment)

@AveaCallister
Copy link

I thought this was related to this issue. It seems that callouts, inline DQL and Metabind code are incompatible when adjacent to each other. Metabind doesn't detect the frontmatter field being referred to. i.e:

> [!note]
>`INPUT[number:field0]`
> [field1:: value] units

Results in the input field being empty.

@mProjectsCode
Copy link
Owner

I thought this was related to this issue. It seems that callouts, inline DQL and Metabind code are incompatible when adjacent to each other. Metabind doesn't detect the frontmatter field being referred to. i.e:

> [!note]
>`INPUT[number:field0]`
> [field1:: value] units

Results in the input field being empty.

Can you make a bug report with a reproducible example?

@mProjectsCode
Copy link
Owner

Hello it is May 2024, the dataview support will be amazing! Is this implemented? #107 (comment)

Dataview still does not provide an API for inline fields afaik.

The issue you linked to is implemented. See the API reference in the docs, at the very bottom of the sidebar.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature request New feature or request waiting on upstream change there is an upstream change that needs to happen before this can be worked on
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants