-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 230
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[BUG] {Depth quality difference between OAK-D-LITE models} #1142
Comments
Isn't the photo on the right over-exposed? There is a (much) brighter light-source in the door - will be harder for feature-extraction. |
@brmarkus I tried many different places, always the story like this |
Where the cameras calibrated before? |
@brmarkus |
Have a look here regardng auto-focus versus fixed-focus: https://docs.luxonis.com/projects/hardware/en/latest/pages/guides/af_ff/ There are a few resources regarding calibration. Let's see what Luxonis team can recommend. |
I tried to check my cameras with
Like https://docs.luxonis.com/projects/hardware/en/latest/pages/guides/af_ff/ sais But seems every my camera has fixed-focus |
@MoscowskyAnton You'll have to update the depthai version to latest. |
Hi!
I am working with OAK-D-Lite cameras and found that depth quality is different between cameras.
I have some cameras that my team won in OpenCV AI competition, and some we bought after via aliexpress retailer.
And here is difference on its depth images (obtained with ROS) on default settings:
Also I provide mono images of same place
On the left is new camera (been bought) and on the right is old (been won). Also the ranges in old depth is not seems to be very accurate in comparison to new.
Is there a way to improve quality of olds cameras? Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: