Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[test-triage] I2C - TLM FIFO not empty at end of test #24593

Open
2 tasks
martin-velay opened this issue Sep 18, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
2 tasks

[test-triage] I2C - TLM FIFO not empty at end of test #24593

martin-velay opened this issue Sep 18, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
@hcallahan-lowrisc
Labels
Component:TestTriage IP:i2c Triage Priority Issue to be discussed with priority in the next triage meeting
Milestone
Earlgrey-PROD.M7

Comments

@martin-velay
Copy link
Contributor

Hierarchy of regression failure

Block level

Failure Description

The following error is raised for several seeds:
UVM_ERROR (i2c_scoreboard.sv:716) [scoreboard] controller_mode_rd_obs_fifo item uncompared

Steps to Reproduce

  • GitHub Revision: #25b1acb
  • dvsim invocation command to reproduce the failure, inclusive of build and run seeds:
    ./util/dvsim/dvsim.py hw/ip/i2c/dv/i2c_sim_cfg.hjson -i i2c_host_mode_toggle --fixed-seed 83642804746808679151779794570736594788640700329567191646850288550203524713046

Tests with similar or related failures

  • i2c_host_mode_toggle
  • i2c_host_stress_all -> probably because it calls the i2c_host_mode_toggle vseq
@hayleynewton hayleynewton added this to the Earlgrey-PROD.M7 milestone Sep 20, 2024
@hayleynewton hayleynewton added the Triage Priority Issue to be discussed with priority in the next triage meeting label Sep 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@hcallahan-lowrisc hcallahan-lowrisc

Labels
Component:TestTriage IP:i2c Triage Priority Issue to be discussed with priority in the next triage meeting
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Earlgrey-PROD.M7
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@rswarbrick @hayleynewton @hcallahan-lowrisc @martin-velay