You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi,
I was puzzled for a while with a case where the combination of fulljones and invert=False in the ApplyCal step produced strange results. The weird thing was that my solutions appeared to be good, so applying them to the data (invert=True) lead to good results.
Eventually I figured that the only difference in the parsets is the order of the phase and amplitude soltab, so one time I used cor.soltab=[amplitude000,phase000], the other cor.soltab=[phase000,amplitude000]. Changing the order seems to do the trick.
From the documentation, I would not assume the order of the soltabs to be important.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @rvweeren, I did not test the case invert=False in combination with the order [phase000,amplitude000], but I would expect that the behavior is similar.
I think this could be more a case of an ambiguous documentation than a bug, my initial understanding was that one provides two soltab names in ApplyCal and DP3 figures internally which one is the amps/phases of the fulljones. But it might be that the first one is always assumed to contain the amplitudes and the second one the phases.
"The name or names of the H5 soltab. Currently only used when correction=fulljones, in which case soltab should list two names (amplitude and phase soltab)"
That does indeed not suggest to a user that the order is relevant. So if soltab=[amplitude000,phase000] is indeed the only correct way for fulljones the documentation should make this very clear. In fact, I would even say DP3 should give an error if a user tries soltab=[phase000,amplitude000] with fulljones applycal. Can one of the developers give some more info on order and fulljones? (I'm getting worried about the fullones applycal now in my own scripts as I was not paying attention to order)
Hi,
I was puzzled for a while with a case where the combination of
fulljones
andinvert=False
in the ApplyCal step produced strange results. The weird thing was that my solutions appeared to be good, so applying them to the data (invert=True) lead to good results.Eventually I figured that the only difference in the parsets is the order of the phase and amplitude soltab, so one time I used
cor.soltab=[amplitude000,phase000]
, the othercor.soltab=[phase000,amplitude000]
. Changing the order seems to do the trick.From the documentation, I would not assume the order of the soltabs to be important.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: