Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

How should lingo interact with nix? #33

Open
lhstrh opened this issue Jul 30, 2023 · 4 comments
Open

How should lingo interact with nix? #33

lhstrh opened this issue Jul 30, 2023 · 4 comments
Assignees

Comments

@lhstrh
Copy link
Member

lhstrh commented Jul 30, 2023

See lf-lang/lingua-franca@75ebf6d#r1278621320 for more context.

@tanneberger
Copy link
Member

tanneberger commented Aug 1, 2023

you mean the nix that is shipped by the our pico lf template ?

@lhstrh
Copy link
Member Author

lhstrh commented Aug 1, 2023

I'm referring to the nix configuration in https://github.com/lf-lang/lf-3pi-template, but I'm interested in answering this question in the broader scope of what this might look like when we depend on lingo to build packages like these.

@gundralaa
Copy link
Contributor

I think that nix should run outside of lingo. It makes more sense to me to use nix as an optional packaging system for certain applications like lf-3pi-template and make sure lingo and lfc are accessible as packages in the shell.

@tanneberger
Copy link
Member

Agreed, wrapping nix around lingo makes more sense.

and so far we didn't work against the nix paradigm.

@cmnrd cmnrd changed the title How should lingo deal interact with nix? How should lingo interact with nix? Apr 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants