Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(RingTheory/Derivation/Basic): define lifting a derivation via an algebra homomorphism #16792

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Command-Master
Copy link
Collaborator


Open in Gitpod

@Command-Master Command-Master added the t-algebra Algebra (groups, rings, fields, etc) label Sep 14, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 14, 2024

PR summary 4844c6d42c

Import changes for modified files

No significant changes to the import graph

Import changes for all files
Files Import difference

Declarations diff

+ liftOfRightInverse
+ liftOfRightInverse_apply
+ liftOfSurjective
+ liftOfSurjective_apply

You can run this locally as follows
## summary with just the declaration names:
./scripts/declarations_diff.sh <optional_commit>

## more verbose report:
./scripts/declarations_diff.sh long <optional_commit>

The doc-module for script/declarations_diff.sh contains some details about this script.

@kbuzzard
Copy link
Member

Looking at this PR, it's descending a derivation on A to a derivation on M along a surjection, and the descent (possibly) depends on an auxiliary set-theoretic section. Is it true that the construction is independent of the choice of section?

@Command-Master
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Apologies, I don't know those terms. Are you asking if the defined derivation is independent of which inverse is taken? It is, because if f a = f b then f (a - b) = 0 so by hd f (d (a - b)) = 0, or f (d a) = f (d b)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
t-algebra Algebra (groups, rings, fields, etc)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants