-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 669
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Descheduling framework wrap up #1187
Comments
As we discussed in the community meeting, wanted to list a few efforts that we can start looking at again with the current state of the framework (now that we unblocked a bunch of efforts that were paused before):
Let me know if I am forgetting something. We probably should give weights to those with regards to complexity and importance and the prioritize what we want as must haves first. |
Like we talked about on the sig call, we have 2 categories of things to work on now for what's next: tech debt we shelved in the interest of moving along a framework release, and feature development that was blocked on the framework refactoring too much of the code. I would like to prioritize the tech debt. But at this point, that shouldn't significantly block any more feature development, so those can happen in parallel. For a long-term roadmap, the ideal "done" goal should be getting to a v1 api/v1.0 release. What that means right now isn't totally clear besides making the descheduler more extensible and maintainable. So, I think another good task would be to come up with some criteria for defining when we're ready to make that cut, and work tasks in toward that. |
@damemi @knelasevero @ingvagabund any idea if any work has been done on this issue #923 or any priority on this one? I remember I decided to take it up but couldn't start on it last year. I'm available again to work on it and would be happy to contribute if it's okay to go. |
We have some examples under https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/descheduler/tree/master/examples. Though, there's still no comprehensive guide for creating and registering a plugin to the framework. Yet, providing a guide on how to create a new plugin is already welcome. The part of registering a plugin can be done later once the |
@knelasevero thanks for the comprehensive list of todo. Work on any of the mentioned items can be started/resumed. The telemetry part might still experience a shifting code until the |
This is really great list! Thanks for this. I'd like to get into #696, if someone enlighten my way and show where to start to initialize an "event-triggered strategy". |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues. This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
/remove-lifecycle stale |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues. This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
Remaining bits:
pluginregistry.Register
in https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/descheduler/blob/master/pkg/descheduler/setupplugins.go#L39C2-L49 to pass less argumentsdescheduler
. So it can be replaced with a generic way of populating the fake clientset cache. I was thinking of some hooks since the cachedClient is recreated in every descheduling loop (and rewritting internalsharedInformerFactory
).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: