next release date

[anis-campos]

hi @koxudaxi, thanks for merging #2102.

I'm looking forward for the next release, do you know when will it be ? my team is waiting for it to do some work with the generator.

Thanks in advance.

[koxudaxi]

@anis-campos

There's one point of concern. I was thinking of releasing once this is resolved.
I don't want to make any breaking changes, but could I get your opinion on this? Copy
#2100 (comment)

[anis-campos]

Ho I see. well, I changed the logic of the default value in my PR. I wonder if the assertion made iin the comment is still true, datetime is not the default value of the field anymore.

let me check this 🤔

[anis-campos]

Ok so now that the both the config output_datetime_class and the later argument target_datetime_class are optional with default to None, I don't think the default changed.

And from what I undersand, the whole point of #2100 can be resumed to

datamodel-code-generator/datamodel_code_generator/model/pydantic_v2/types.py

Lines 39 to 42 in 4d67a81

	if target_datetime_class == DatetimeClassType.Awaredatetime:
	result[Types.date_time] = data_type.from_import(IMPORT_AWARE_DATETIME)
	if target_datetime_class == DatetimeClassType.Naivedatetime:
	result[Types.date_time] = data_type.from_import(IMPORT_NAIVE_DATETIME)

, so no harm can be done unless you choose to use native or aware.

So I guess I fixed the issue 😄