-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
issues 10, 20, 25, 26 #33
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Some minor points in comments.
As discussed I have some other concerns regarding aspects that are currently described as part of an rml:Source
like rml:null
or CSVW
descriptions which we cannot reuse in fields in the current state of rml-lv vs rml-io. But we can raise a different issue for this.
Co-authored-by: Pano Maria <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Pano Maria <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Pano Maria <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Pano Maria <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Pano Maria <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: elsdvlee <[email protected]>
Made issue 34 for the unresolved point. |
What's changed
Added mixed content specification.
Adapted field specification.
Adapted example 9.
Change checklist
Issue reference
Fixes #10.
Fixes #20.
Fixes #25.
Fixes #26.