Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Method for correction based on testing number #58

Open
noamross opened this issue May 6, 2020 · 3 comments
Open

Method for correction based on testing number #58

noamross opened this issue May 6, 2020 · 3 comments

Comments

@noamross
Copy link

noamross commented May 6, 2020

Hello there, great work. I was wondering if you could share your code or methodology for correcting for the number of tests performed in adjusting the number of cases. We are doing some similar work and are trying to compare methods used for this. Thanks! @bbolker

@barretod
Copy link

Hi, any updates on this? Looks like you made a major change a week ago and we would like to review that.

@smbartell
Copy link

smbartell commented May 18, 2020

I'm also very curious about that. There's no obvious way to do it. If testing were random, you could just normalize by the number of tests... but testing is not random, it's targeted at those with the highest prior probability of infection based on their symptoms and/or contact with known cases, and as testing expands it inherently dips into people with lower prior probabilities of testing positive. It's difficult to imagine a coherent method of adjustment without detailed information on the testing protocols and case contact patterns in each county.

@barretod
Copy link

@k-sys PLEASE push the changes you've made, just noticed you updated the model again two days ago but have decided not to make the model changes public. We're using this model for other countries/regions and this could really help!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants