We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
There are a few different types of object schemas
at least for now, when additional props is used on its own, we should give the type HashMap<String, ..>.
HashMap<String, ..>
If just props is used, it should be a simple struct.
If both are used, it should be a struct alongside a flattened AdditionalProps field.
AdditionalProps
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
There are a few different types of object schemas
at least for now, when additional props is used on its own, we should give the type
HashMap<String, ..>
.If just props is used, it should be a simple struct.
If both are used, it should be a struct alongside a flattened
AdditionalProps
field.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: