Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Allow processing of a stream of separate JSON elements #14

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Allow processing of a stream of separate JSON elements #14

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

wryun
Copy link

@wryun wryun commented Aug 9, 2017

See #11

@danvk
Copy link

danvk commented Feb 18, 2018

+1, this would allow jp to work with ndjson. I'd even argue that this should be the default behavior of jp, rather than hidden behind a flag. This is how jq works.

@lostinthefrost
Copy link

+1, and I agree this should be the default behavior.

@suntong
Copy link

suntong commented Jun 5, 2021

Now available in https://github.com/go-jsonfile/jp/releases/tag/v0.1.5

@wryun
Copy link
Author

wryun commented Jun 5, 2021 •
edited
Loading

Heh, well, if we're saying that, it's been available at https://github.com/wryun/jp for a few years now (with other useful additions) :)

EDIT: not to say it wouldn't be a good thing if someone picked up jp and started maintaining it, which I'm definitely not going to do. Good luck!

zmedico pushed a commit to pipebus/jpp that referenced this pull request Jun 15, 2021
@zmedico
jpp: Add --stream, -s bool flag
ba4e883 
Rebased jmespath/jp#14 on jpp master.
zmedico added a commit to pipebus/jpp that referenced this pull request Jun 15, 2021
@zmedico
jpp: Make stream behavior unconditional and remove --stream, -s flag
d75cf88 
Mirrors sentiments expressed here:

jmespath/jp#14 (comment)
jmespath/jp#14 (comment)
@zmedico
Copy link
Contributor

zmedico commented Jun 15, 2021

+1, this would allow jp to work with ndjson. I'd even argue that this should be the default behavior of jp, rather than hidden behind a flag. This is how jq works.

+1, and I agree this should be the default behavior.

Now available in https://github.com/go-jsonfile/jp/releases/tag/v0.1.5

Also available as the default behavior in jpp, an extended superset of the jp command: #30

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
5 participants
@wryun @danvk @lostinthefrost @suntong @zmedico