Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Confuse about the reslut #23

Open
lixiny opened this issue Nov 27, 2018 · 8 comments
Open

Confuse about the reslut #23

lixiny opened this issue Nov 27, 2018 · 8 comments

Comments

@lixiny
Copy link

lixiny commented Nov 27, 2018

Great work ! Thanks for sharing.
however in your terminal session the Result shows the tf from /ar_marker_0 to /ee_link:, how ever in the eye-in-hand usage we really care about the tf from /ee_link to /camera_link, any suggestion?

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented May 28, 2019

Hey, Did u solve this problem? I need transformation from /ee_link to /camera_link too.

@SarfarazHabib
Copy link

Hey, Did you get the answer for this ??

@lixiny
Copy link
Author

lixiny commented Apr 1, 2020

Hi @SarfarazHabib. I did some modification so the results show transformation from /ee_link to /camera_link too. please follow:

https://github.com/lixiny/Handeye-Calibration-ROS

in my repo.

Thanks for the jhu-lcsr' s original release.

@SarfarazHabib
Copy link

Hey @lixiny Thanks for your help. It works for me now :)

@PeakDing
Copy link

PeakDing commented Apr 8, 2020

Hey @lixiny can you explain a little how you solve the problem with your handeye_online,launch, Thanks

@lixiny
Copy link
Author

lixiny commented Apr 16, 2020

@FrankLin9981
Copy link

Hi, @lixiny , your solution really works for me now. Thanks a lot!
However, I still can't figure out why this simple modification can make the whole thing work.
Could you briefly explain the reason behind?
I will appreciate it.

@lixiny
Copy link
Author

lixiny commented Sep 7, 2020

Hi, @FrankLin9981 , I suggest you to visualize the transformations by drawing it down or using RVIZ. I drew the transformations of the: AX=XB and found that the original implementation (may) has tiny little bug on the problem of eye-in-hand.

hope this can help you.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants