diff --git a/DESCRIPTION b/DESCRIPTION
index 5ea5c35..bdbd147 100644
--- a/DESCRIPTION
+++ b/DESCRIPTION
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Date: 2023-11-29
Package: CHNOSZ
-Version: 2.0.0-35
+Version: 2.0.0-36
Title: Thermodynamic Calculations and Diagrams for Geochemistry
Authors@R: c(
person("Jeffrey", "Dick", , "j3ffdick@gmail.com", role = c("aut", "cre"),
diff --git a/inst/CHECKLIST b/inst/CHECKLIST
index 43ac293..e3cd842 100644
--- a/inst/CHECKLIST
+++ b/inst/CHECKLIST
@@ -79,3 +79,10 @@ Making vignettes for website (https://chnosz.net)
- After making vignettes, run doc/mklinks.sh in installed directory
(this adds links to the HTML renditions of Rd files)
+
+***************
+Temporary Items
+***************
+
+- Replace reference to "development version of CHNOSZ (to be 2.0.1)" in FAQ.Rmd.
+
diff --git a/inst/NEWS.Rd b/inst/NEWS.Rd
index 4c2cc32..4c31bbb 100644
--- a/inst/NEWS.Rd
+++ b/inst/NEWS.Rd
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
\newcommand{\Cp}{\ifelse{latex}{\eqn{C_P}}{\ifelse{html}{\out{CP}}{Cp}}}
\newcommand{\DG0}{\ifelse{latex}{\eqn{{\Delta}G^{\circ}}}{\ifelse{html}{\out{ΔG°}}{ΔG°}}}
-\section{Changes in CHNOSZ version 2.0.0-34 (2023-11-28)}{
+\section{Changes in CHNOSZ version 2.0.0-36 (2023-11-29)}{
\itemize{
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
\item How can minerals with polymorphic transitions be added to the database?
\item How can I make a diagram with the trisulfur radical ion (S\s{3}\S{-})?
\item In OBIGT, what is the meaning of \code{T} for solids, liquids, and gases?
- \item How do I plot mineral buffers for pH?
+ \item How can mineral pH buffers be plotted?
}
diff --git a/vignettes/FAQ.Rmd b/vignettes/FAQ.Rmd
index a944673..3b51651 100644
--- a/vignettes/FAQ.Rmd
+++ b/vignettes/FAQ.Rmd
@@ -751,11 +751,11 @@ In previous versions of CHNOSZ, values of Δ*G*° above the *C~p~* equation limi
*Added on 2023-11-15.*
-## How do I plot mineral buffers for pH?
+## How can mineral pH buffers be plotted?
-Unlike mineral redox buffers, the K-feldspar–muscovite–quartz (KMQ) and muscovite–kaolinite (MC) buffers for pH are known as "sliding scale" buffers because they do not determine pH but rather the activity ratio of `r Kplus` to `r Hplus` [@HA05].
-To add these buffers to a `r logfO2`–pH diagram in CHNOSZ, choose basis species that include Al+3 (the least mobile element, which the reactions are balanced on), quartz (this is needed for the KMQ buffer), the mobile ions `r Kplus` and `r Hplus`, and the remaining elements in `r H2O` and `r O2` (`oxygen` denotes the gas in OBIGT).
-The formation reactions for these minerals don't involve `r O2`, but it is required so that the number of basis species equals the number of elements plus one for charge.
+Unlike mineral redox buffers, the K-feldspar–muscovite–quartz (KMQ) and muscovite–kaolinite (MC) pH buffers are known as "sliding scale" buffers because they do not determine pH but rather the activity ratio of `r Kplus` to `r Hplus` [@HA05].
+To add these buffers to a `r logfO2`–pH diagram in CHNOSZ, choose basis species that include Al+3 (the least mobile element, which the reactions are balanced on), quartz (this is needed for the KMQ buffer), the mobile ions `r Kplus` and `r Hplus`, and the remaining elements in `r H2O` and `r O2`; `oxygen` denotes the gas in OBIGT.
+The formation reactions for these minerals don't involve `r O2`, but it must be present so that the number of basis species equals the number of elements +1 (i.e. elements plus charge).
```{r KMQ_basis_species, message = FALSE}
basis(c("Al+3", "quartz", "K+", "H+", "H2O", "oxygen"))
@@ -783,15 +783,16 @@ K_AK <- 10 ^ logK_AK
This calculation gives a molality of `r Kplus` that is lower than unity and accordingly makes the buffers less acidic [@HC14].
Now we can apply the calculated molality of `r Kplus` to the basis species and add the buffer lines to the diagram.
-Note the `IS` argument is also used for `affinity()` so that activities are replaced by molalities (that is, affinity is calculated with standard Gibbs energies adjusted for ionic strength; this has the same effect as calculating activity coefficients).
-```{r KMQ_diagram, eval = FALSE, echo = 2:9}
+The `IS` argument is also used for `affinity()` so that activities are replaced by molalities (that is, affinity is calculated with standard Gibbs energies adjusted for ionic strength; this has the same effect as calculating activity coefficients).
+```{r KMQ_diagram, eval = FALSE, echo = 2:10}
par(mfrow = c(1, 2))
basis("K+", log10(m_K))
a <- affinity(pH = c(2, 10), O2 = c(-55, -38), T = T, P = P, IS = IS)
diagram(a, srt = 90)
dTP <- as.expression(c(lT(T), lP(P)))
legend("topleft", legend = dTP, bty = "n", inset = c(-0.05, 0), cex = 0.9)
-legend("topright", c("Unit molality of Cl-", "Quartz saturation"), bty = "n", cex = 0.9)
+ltxt <- c(quote("Unit molality of Cl"^"-"), "Quartz saturation")
+legend("topright", legend = ltxt, bty = "n", cex = 0.9)
title("Mineral data from Berman (1988)\nand Sverjensky et al. (1991) (OBIGT default)",
font.main = 1, cex.main = 0.9)
add.OBIGT("SUPCRT92")
@@ -804,22 +805,23 @@ OBIGT()
```{r KMQ_diagram, message = FALSE, fig.width = 8, fig.height = 4, out.width = "100%", results = "hide", echo = FALSE, dpi = dpi}
```
-In this diagram, the gray area is below the reducing stability limit of water (i.e., where the equilibrium fugacity of `r H2` exceeds unity).
-The diagram in Fig. 4 of @HC14 shows lines at somewhat higher pH; ca. 5 and 6 for the two buffers.
-There are several possible reasons for the differences:
+The gray area, which is automatically drawn by `diagram()`, is below the reducing stability limit of water; that is, this area is where the equilibrium fugacity of `r H2` exceeds unity.
+
+The diagram in Fig. 4 of @HC14 shows the buffer lines at somewhat higher pH values of ca. 5 and 6.
+There are several possible reasons for these differences:
1. We used different thermodynamic data for the minerals;
2. Activity coefficients either were not calculated or were calculated differently by @HC14 (however, removing `IS` from the code moves the lines to lower rather than higher pH); or
-3. We calculated `r Kplus` molality incorrectly for the MC buffer [this represents "clay-rich but feldspar-free sediments", but we used the feldspathic Ab–Kfs reaction becauase no other reaction was given by @HC14].
+3. We calculated `r Kplus` molality incorrectly for the MC buffer. Although @HC14 invoked the muscovite–kaolinite buffer for "clay-rich but feldspar-free sediments", we used the feldspathic Ab–Kfs reaction for calculating `r Kplus` molality [no alternative reaction was given by @HC14].
-Addressing only the first point, note that the parameters for these minerals in the default OBIGT database come from @Ber88 and @SHD91.
+Regarding only the first point, note that the parameters for these minerals in the default OBIGT database come from @Ber88 and @SHD91.
```{r KMQ_refs, message = FALSE}
thermo.refs(species()$ispecies)
```
If we use the thermodynamic parameters for minerals from @HDNB78, we get the lines shown in the second plot above, representing a larger stability field for muscovite.
-```{r KMQ_diagram, eval = FALSE, echo = 10:14}
+```{r KMQ_diagram, eval = FALSE, echo = 11:15}
```
*Added on 2023-11-28.*
diff --git a/vignettes/mklinks.sh b/vignettes/mklinks.sh
index c8ec90a..cbfb849 100755
--- a/vignettes/mklinks.sh
+++ b/vignettes/mklinks.sh
@@ -148,3 +148,4 @@ sed -i 's/thermo.refs()<\/code>/subcrt()<\/code>/subcrt()<\/a><\/code>/g' FAQ.html
sed -i 's/check.GHS()<\/code>/check.GHS()<\/a><\/code>/g' FAQ.html
sed -i 's/affinity()<\/code>/affinity()<\/a><\/code>/g' FAQ.html
+sed -i 's/diagram()<\/code>/diagram()<\/a><\/code>/g' FAQ.html