You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The feature "timeline for a single file", invoked by caL, does not seem to be time-sorted.
In the original file, I have a TODO scheduled for a Wednesday at 15:00, a TODO scheduled for a Friday at 15:00, and a TODO scheduled for a Wednesday at 17:00. In the agenda screen invoked by caL, those TODOs wrongfully appear in the aforementioned order. I also note that the timeline does not include events with date stamps but without times (i.e. <2020-05-06 Wed> will not appear, but <2020-05-06 Wed 15:00> will). Not sure if that's intended functionality, but it would be much more helpful if they were included (perhaps with a default value of 00:00).
Am I misunderstanding what 'time-sorted' means, or is this a bug?
Thank you.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Looks like a bug to me. I am an active user of caa function (weekly summary), and I also see that the items are completely misplaced if some items are scheduled with time included (e.g. <2023-05-12 Fri 12:00>) and some others are not (e.g. <2023-05-12 Fri>).
Both time formats are documented for Emacs org-mode, so vim-orgmode should ideally support them well too.
The feature "timeline for a single file", invoked by caL, does not seem to be time-sorted.
In the original file, I have a TODO scheduled for a Wednesday at 15:00, a TODO scheduled for a Friday at 15:00, and a TODO scheduled for a Wednesday at 17:00. In the agenda screen invoked by caL, those TODOs wrongfully appear in the aforementioned order. I also note that the timeline does not include events with date stamps but without times (i.e. <2020-05-06 Wed> will not appear, but <2020-05-06 Wed 15:00> will). Not sure if that's intended functionality, but it would be much more helpful if they were included (perhaps with a default value of 00:00).
Am I misunderstanding what 'time-sorted' means, or is this a bug?
Thank you.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: