You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I can see unexpected behavior in EnhancedQueueExecutor [1]. Even when I set allowsCoreThreadTimeOut to false, sometimes happens that pool size goes below core size by a few threads.
Test scenario:
create EnhancedQueueExecutor with coreSize=3, maxSize=6, allowsCoreThreadTimeOut=false, keepAliveTimeout=1000ms
submit 6 threads into executor and wait until all are running so maxSize is reached
allow all threads to finish and wait some time for threads to timeout
Expected result is that poolSize will be 3 as coreSize=3 but sometimes happens that poolSize is 2 or 1.
This might not be a bug as EnhancedQueueExecutor estimates its pool size and might allow to timeout more threads than coreSize. I'm creating this jira so it's explained for future reference.
It looks like the same as JBTHR-49. But JBTHR-49 was fixed in jboss-threads version 2.3.1.Final, 2.4.0.Final, and wildfly-core currently has jboss-threads version 2.3.3.Final, but still sees this problem.
This comment was imported from JIRA. It was originally authored by @chengfang.
I can see unexpected behavior in EnhancedQueueExecutor [1]. Even when I set allowsCoreThreadTimeOut to false, sometimes happens that pool size goes below core size by a few threads.
Test scenario:
Expected result is that poolSize will be 3 as coreSize=3 but sometimes happens that poolSize is 2 or 1.
This might not be a bug as EnhancedQueueExecutor estimates its pool size and might allow to timeout more threads than coreSize. I'm creating this jira so it's explained for future reference.
[1] https://github.com/jbossas/jboss-threads/blob/2.3.3.Final/src/main/java/org/jboss/threads/EnhancedQueueExecutor.java
[2] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/EAP7-488
This issue was imported from JIRA. The original issue is JBTHR-78. It was originally reported by @mnovak1.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: