You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
_pyroClaimOwnership is a method on a proxy, not on a Pyro server object.
Look at various examples that use it, but mainly the "threadproxysharing" example.
Hi @irmen thank you for the response! Just a brief follow up question, and fyi I am coming from this issue where I am trying to interact with an OpcDaClient (Pyro5.api.expose) on multiple threads.
Is there some way to hand ownership of a Pyro server object to another thread? Thank you in advance for your help if you can provide any further guidance.
@jamesbraza There is no concept of exclusive server object ownership in Pyro5 natively. Server object instance(s) - or rather, preferably, classes - are made available to be called concurrently by whatever client can create a proper proxy to call it. If you want to somehow limit the concurrency on objects, you have to control it using the behavior decorator on the server object, and/or roll your own client/server "pair" protocol somehow perhaps.
I've talked about this a bit more in replies to other past issues for instance here - see there for some relevant doc links
and be sure to study the "instancemode" and "usersession" examples, amongst others
Let's say I have a minimal API:
I am trying to use
_pyroClaimOwnership()
onfoo
above, but am getting anAttributeError
:How do exposed API's call
_pyroClaimOwnership()
?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: