Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

discretization: use part_id instead of removed part_nr #332

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 6, 2024

Conversation

alexfikl
Copy link
Collaborator

@alexfikl alexfikl commented Mar 6, 2024

Missed this when working on inducer/meshmode#396.

@inducer inducer merged commit df1c6f2 into inducer:main Mar 6, 2024
6 checks passed
@inducer
Copy link
Owner

inducer commented Mar 6, 2024

Thx!

@alexfikl alexfikl deleted the fix-deprecated-part-nr branch March 6, 2024 17:27
@inducer
Copy link
Owner

inducer commented Mar 6, 2024

Out of curiosity: how come the downstream test didn't flag this?

@alexfikl
Copy link
Collaborator Author

alexfikl commented Mar 6, 2024

Out of curiosity: how come the downstream test didn't flag this?

Hm, seems to be in distributed_boundary_swap_connection.. Does the upstream run not use MPI?

EDIT: Grepped a bit and it seems like it should be called, so no idea..

@inducer
Copy link
Owner

inducer commented Mar 6, 2024

@inducer
Copy link
Owner

inducer commented Mar 6, 2024

So no mystery here. Thanks for looking... I feel like I could've answered that myself. 😬 Sorry!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants