Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tonel format in GemStone #568

Open
sonibla opened this issue Sep 20, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

Tonel format in GemStone #568

sonibla opened this issue Sep 20, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@sonibla
Copy link

sonibla commented Sep 20, 2022

Hello

I'm not 100% sure because I have very few experience with SmalltalkCI, but It seems SmalltalkCI doesn't support tonel formal when loading a project into GemStone

The workflow fails because it's trying to use filetree to load my tonel project (it fails in Gemstone but not in Pharo)

The logic seems to be hard coded for GemStone:
https://github.com/hpi-swa/smalltalkCI/blob/master/repository/SmalltalkCI-GemStone-Core.package/SCIGemStoneMetacelloLoadSpec.class/instance/repositorySchemeIn..st

For comparison, Pharo:
https://github.com/hpi-swa/smalltalkCI/blob/master/repository/SmalltalkCI-Pharo-Core.package/SCIPharoMetacelloLoadSpec.class/instance/repositorySchemeIn..st

Is it possible to implement the GemStone logic the same way it's implemented for Pharo? or is there some limitation in GemStone?

@tom95
Copy link
Contributor

tom95 commented Sep 20, 2022

Hi @sonibla! If gemstone already has a way to read tonel repositories, you could try if the same code that squeak uses would work for you: https://github.com/hpi-swa/smalltalkCI/blob/master/repository/SmalltalkCI-Squeak-Core.package/SCISqueakMetacelloLoadSpec.class/instance/repositorySchemeIn..st

@dalehenrich
Copy link
Collaborator

GemStone does not support tonel format repositories ... we are planning to support tonel in the future ...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants